From: Don Baldwin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>A firearm?
>A baseball bat?
>CS or pepper spray?
>A cattle prod?
>A plastic shield such as the police use?
>A clothes prop?
>A rottweiler?
>
>Our right to self defence has not descended anywhere. I repeat.......ad
>nauseum....you all have a right to self defence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>It just so happens that firearms are not available for self defence.
Can't you even see the internal contradictions inherent in
those comments?
You can't own a firearm for the purpose of self defense
in the home.
You can't carry ANY weapon for purposes of self defense in
public.
In contrast, I am able to carry lockback knives at all
times. I am able to carry pepper spray at all times.
I am licensed to carry a concealed handgun.
Are you going to honestly say that British folks on this
list have as much ability to defend themselves as I do?
>The law only restricts self defence as being a good reason for possession.
Why? IT's the most important reason for owning firearms.
If you give up the right to use firearms as defensive weapons
then they are just dangerous toys - why not ban them?
Don
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
