On 08/30/2016 06:25 PM, juan wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:50:26 -0700 > Razer <ray...@riseup.net> wrote: > >> On 08/30/2016 05:28 AM, John Newman agreed with this statement by some >> cloistered schmuck he didn't bother mentioning: >> >> >>> "they could be made to pay damages if they sold adulterated stuff" >> >> >> "Make me motherfucker... My gun's bigger than yours and I have a >> badder gang and more friends who'll bury you in a shallow ditch. >> >> Fuck YOU CUNT you get NOTHING." >> >> >> Am I making my point John? Better get a BIG gun and bigger cojones if >> you want to collect. >> >> Rr > > > Yes, your point is clear rayzer. You know nothing about > liberalism, and your only 'argument' against it is to pretend > that a society based on respect for person and property, > free-trade, etc would actually be a civil war. >
Your civil society without oversight is absolute bullshit. Or else you wouldn't be a venom spewing prick, now would you? "Liberalism" is nonsense. It only exists in the mind and mouth of the Psychopath, and other psychopaths like them who self-select and act rather... ahem... gang and thug-like i their behavior. They can be noted immediately by their tendency to RATPACK people. ioerror comes to mind. > > Forgetting for a second that apparentely you know nothing about > the liberal position you strongly 'criticize' by means of > retarded misrepresentation, Are you also proposing a different > system? And what system is that? > I'm proposing, as so many political writers in history have purported, thet first there has to be change in the people. Desperation over economics caused by insecurity of a product like food doesn't lend to that security. I propose (GASP!) that you have to be the fucking change you want to see in society. What a fucking revolutionary concept > > > >
