On 11/18/2010 10:00 AM, Fernando Perez wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Craig Citro<craigci...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> but just >> for the sake of completeness, are there any features code.google.com >> has that github doesn't? (Or vice-versa?) Are they things we'd ever be >> likely to notice? >> > I say this as a flat out github fan, who's thrilled we moved for > IPython and everything else I'm involved with. But... the github bug > tracker is *vastly* inferior to google's. I keep hoping that, with > how great github is getting very quickly, they'll soon roll out > something to improve the bug tracker, because it's frankly painfully > primitive. > > Whoever thought out the google code bug tracker was a smart cookie. > It relies on what appears to be a plain labels system, but with very > simple conventions on how to declare the labels, it basically encodes > a full key-value system on which queries can later be made, reports, > etc. It's a really elegant piece of work: > > http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/IssueTracker > > The github tracker is dumb as a brick in comparison, and their search > doesn't even work right. It's frankly embarrassing, and it sticks out > as a sore thumb compared to how great pretty much everything else > there is. > > It's only the fact that the contrast is so stark, that makes me hope > it won't last :) >
Hmm. It seems that GitHub itself uses Lighthouse (lighthouseapp.com), and that there's some Lighthous/Github integration. Lighthouse appears to be free for open source projects, although it is a bit of work to check how well the Github integration works. Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
