> I'm not sure which "we" you are referring to here, but you made your > point quite clearly and it was acknowledged. "Political restrictions" > and other non-technical issues are perfectly valid objections to bring > up, but belaboring the point, especially as someone who has never (as > far as I can tell) participated in the development process and hence > used the tools in question, doesn't help your case.
Ouch. > To be clear, every potential solution involves giving up some freedom. > Each site has terms of service agreements that are pages long, and > even hosting it ourselves isn't completely unencumbered (software > licenses agreements (yes, including the GPL), contracts with the ISP, > possible legal restrictions, etc.) You hopefully already know > this--you've chosen to use a gmail account to post this. Personally, > my top (but certainly not only) criteria are > > 1. Lack of Lock-in > 2. Productivity > > Everyone has different criteria and priorities, which is why I started > this conversation instead of just moving everything over and making an > announcement :). Yes, I'm sorry if I was implying you weren't being open to discussion; I'm very glad of the atmosphere y'all have created here, Best, Matthew _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
