Hi Kingsley,

Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> 
> Note that Virtuoso does support inferencing for subclass and subproperty.
> The issue here is that no inferencing rules have been requested or 
> created during the various data loads into Virtuoso.
> 
> See: http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparqlrule.html

Having this lightweight inference support for subclasses and 
subproperties would be great. We tried it locally on one of our own 
machines by loading DBpedia into Virtuoso and creating a rule. However, 
we ran out of memory while the rule was created (the machine has 4GB RAM 
- there may have been other tools consuming some of the memory). Do you 
have an idea how much memory is required to load and run DBpedia in 
Virtuoso with inference support for subclasses and subproperties?

Would it be possible to include inference support in the public SPARQL 
endpoint? If I understand correctly, there shoudn't be any significant 
performance drawback for SPARQL queries, which do not explicity ask for 
  inference support (using "sparql define input:inference $ruleset").

Kind regards,

Jens

-- 
Dipl. Inf. Jens Lehmann
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Homepage: http://www.jens-lehmann.org
GPG Key: http://jens-lehmann.org/jens_lehmann.asc

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to