In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kingsley Idehen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >We can inference over rules for classes and subclasses.
Sounds good. >I'll look at what you've sent when I have a moment. If you've sent >triples then we can create rules etc.. If all is done right we might >even make a nice tutorial out of this whole thing. If I've got it slightly wrong, let me know and I'll sort it out. The property mappings are an XML document, so it's trivial to re-express them differently if I've misunderstood the required format. Is it a worthwhile project to consider the overall ontology represented by the extracted WP classes and properties, and to work out how to improve retrieval in dbpedia by (a) adding this sort of equivalence mapping and (b) recommending "best practice" for class and property values in WP templates, to improve the quality of what comes in in the first place? Richard -- Richard Light XML/XSLT and Museum Information Consultancy [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
