Richard Light wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kingsley Idehen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> >> We can inference over rules for classes and subclasses. > > Sounds good. Meant to say subclasses & subproperties. > >> I'll look at what you've sent when I have a moment. If you've sent >> triples then we can create rules etc.. If all is done right we might >> even make a nice tutorial out of this whole thing. > > If I've got it slightly wrong, let me know and I'll sort it out. The > property mappings are an XML document, so it's trivial to re-express > them differently if I've misunderstood the required format. > > Is it a worthwhile project to consider the overall ontology > represented by the extracted WP classes and properties, and to work > out how to improve retrieval in dbpedia by (a) adding this sort of > equivalence mapping and (b) recommending "best practice" for class and > property values in WP templates, to improve the quality of what comes > in in the first place? > > Richard Nothing else to do, we have eough to experiment with etc.
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
