debian-ctte  

Messages by Thread

• • Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default? Marco d'Itri
• Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Holger Levsen
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Holger Levsen
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Hideki Yamane
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Hideki Yamane
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default? /usr by default Simon McVittie
  • Processed: Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default? /usr by default Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default? /usr by default Hideki Yamane
  • Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default? Hideki Yamane
  • Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default? Cyril Brulebois
• Bug#914897: affects private debs too Adam Borowski
  • Bug#914897: affects private debs too Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
  • Bug#914897: affects private debs too Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: affects private debs too Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: affects private debs too Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: affects private debs too Marco d'Itri
• Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ian Jackson
  • Processed: Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Julien Cristau
  • Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ian Jackson
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Andreas Henriksson
  • Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Julien Cristau
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Alexander E. Patrakov
  • Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Marco d'Itri
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Adam Borowski
  • Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Wookey
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Marc Haber
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Andreas Henriksson
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Marc Haber
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Marc Haber
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Svante Signell
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Simon McVittie
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Ansgar Burchardt
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Andreas Henriksson
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default Andreas Henriksson
• Term limits Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Term limits Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
• Next Meeting - Wednesday, November 21st 19:00 UTC (today) Margarita Manterola
• Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename Laurent Bigonville
  • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Bug#911225: tech-ctte: Advice on stale libraries in a higher-precedence path entry Simon McVittie
  • Bug#911225: tech-ctte: Advice on stale libraries in a higher-precedence path entry Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#911225: marked as done (tech-ctte: Advice on stale libraries in a higher-precedence path entry) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Next Meeting - Wednesday, October 17th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
• Bye Bye Debian - Pass to DevOne Paolo LX
• Next Meeting - Wednesday, September 19th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
• Next Meeting - Wednesday, August 15th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting - Wednesday, August 15th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
• Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sean Whitton
  • Processed: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Anthony DeRobertis
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Stuart Prescott
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Simon McVittie
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Michael Biebl
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Michael Biebl
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Michael Biebl
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Simon McVittie
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#904558: marked as done (What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Processed: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Bdale Garbee
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Stuart Prescott
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Colin Watson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Raphael Hertzog
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Guillem Jover
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Re: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Stuart Prescott
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Simon McVittie
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Paul Gevers
  • Bug#904302: Notification about TC discussion on possible deprecation of dpkg vendor specific patch series Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: That's a free software issue! Anonymous
  • Bug#904302: That's a free software issue! Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: That's a free software issue! Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive David Bremner
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive David Bremner
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Iain Lane
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Yves-Alexis Perez
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Niko Tyni
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Chris Lamb
  • Bug#904302: marked as done (Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#904302: CTTE decision on vendor-specific patch series (bug #904302) Sean Whitton
• Next Meeting: Wednesday, July 18th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, July 18th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, July 18th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Philip Hands
• Next Meeting: Wednesday, June 20th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, June 20th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
• Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Wouter Verhelst

• Earlier messages
• Later messages