> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:56:03 -0700
> From: rich.teer at rite-group.com
> To: peter.tribble at gmail.com
> CC: Calum.Benson at sun.com; desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org; k_dal2 at 
> hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [desktop-discuss] How to set up gnome terminal to respond to 
> page-up/page-down keys ?
> 
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Peter Tribble wrote:
> 
> > This is a really serious issue. I find that I simply can't do any real work
> > on an SXCE or OpenSolaris based system as a result. Having to remember
> > to hit an extra key is counterintuitive and a significant detriment to
> > productivity, not to mention all the swearing at the machine when you forget
> > and get random characters splattered into your window and end up inputting
> > the wrong command.
> 
> Agreed (though I use SXCE); my solution to this annoyance is to simply not use
> gnome-terminal.  I still use dtterm, which behaves as expected.
> 

Thanks for that tip. Using dtterm might be a nice work-around for these 
pg-up/down
related bugs. I use Opensolaris 2008.11 on my laptop, which doesn't come with
any dt applications under /usr/dt/. Anybody knows what packages from IPS 
I need to install to get dtterm fully operational on Opensolaris (if possible). 
?

I did a raw copy of /usr/dt/bin and lib from my desktop where I run CDE
and I had to copy a few more libraries. I could then test dtterm and pg-up/down
works as expected but the font settings did not work properly. 

One feature that would be nice in IPS would be some way of finding out what
package does a program or file belong to. Maybe there is and I've missed it.
I sometimes find it hard to figure out what packages I need to install for a
certain program.

Regards,

/KarlD

_________________________________________________________________
Discover the new Windows Vista
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/attachments/20080915/227e9b81/attachment.html>

Reply via email to