Yup. I am adding some configs. PRs coming in. On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:24 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Seems like we have a new friendly bot :) > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 8:41 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I opened a few tickets for INFRA and I am also waiting for answer. I > guess > > Xmas period got in the way. > > > > J. > > > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 5:15 AM Kevin Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1! > >> > >> Kaxil Naik <[email protected]>于2019年12月29日 周日下午6:21写道： > >> > >> > Thanks Max, > >> > > >> > I will raise a JIRA with the INFRA to add that too. > >> > > >> > Btw I had raised a request for the 4 integrations > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19607 but looks like it > >> hasn't > >> > gained any traction from them yet. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:29 PM Maxime Beauchemin < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1! > >> > > > >> > > I forgot whether I shared this before, but I wrote a probot for > Apache > >> > > Superset that does a few nice things, and we can grow over time to > do > >> > more > >> > > things without having to beg Apache Infra for anything (currently > only > >> > them > >> > > have admin rights and can register apps on our repos) > >> > > https://github.com/apache-superset/superset-github-bot > >> > > > >> > > This bot, for now [as documented on the README]: > >> > > - enables non-committer to label/unlabel PRs and Issues using > comments > >> > > (allowing PMs and other non-committer to label things) > >> > > - auto-labels all PRs and issues with a [whitelisted] organization > >> (adds > >> > an > >> > > "airbnb" or "lyft" label to the PR) > >> > > - enables forwarding events to other webhooks > >> > > > >> > > Eventually I'd like for it to also auto-label based on files/folder > >> that > >> > > are touched in a PR: for instance "db-migration" or "scheduler" or > >> > > "webserver" would be nice. > >> > > > >> > > We could rename the bot to be an "Apache Github Bot" and keep it > >> > > generalized (it reads a yaml config file from the project's repo, so > >> each > >> > > feature of the bot can be configured on a per-project basis). We > could > >> > > build a collection of things that other Apache projects are likely > to > >> > want. > >> > > We may even be able to automate some Apache email-driven processes > >> using > >> > > Github issues instead, for instance a committer vote process or > >> release > >> > > process vote could be automated by the bot: it would send emails, > ask > >> > > people to use reactions (thumbs up/down) and close the vote / send > the > >> > > RESULTS email templates to the list. It could also look for ASF > >> headers > >> > in > >> > > files (replacing the Apache-RAT). > >> > > > >> > > It could make for a great ApacheCon talk eventually as we add > >> > > functionality. > >> > > > >> > > This is a pet project of mine for now, but I'd love to make room for > >> > people > >> > > to jump in and contribute to it. > >> > > > >> > > Max > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:04 AM Huang Xinbin < > [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 +1 (if I can vote XD) > >> > > > > >> > > > Best > >> > > > Bin > >> > > > > >> > > > On 2019/12/20 13:43:11, Felix Uellendall <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > +1 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 14:17, Tomasz Urbaszek < > >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 for all four. > >> > > > > > T. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:12 PM Kamil Breguła < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jarek Potiuk < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > +100 > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 7:02 AM hotmail < > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > I think the ci-reporter is great, because ours CI log is > >> > > tooooooo > >> > > > long > >> > > > > >> to > >> > > > > >> > > read, and I just want to know what unittest failed in my > PR > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > Best Wish > >> > > > > >> > > — Jiajie > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > -- > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > Jarek Potiuk > >> > > > > >> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software > >> > Engineer > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > >> > > > > >> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Tomasz Urbaszek > >> > > > > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Junior Software Engineer > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > M: +48 505 628 493 <+48505628493> > >> > > > > > E: [email protected] <[email protected]> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Unique Tech > >> > > > > > Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Jarek Potiuk > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > > > > > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >
