+1 for [1] XToYOperator On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for XToYOperator > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak > <basharens...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote: > > > #1 -> XToYOperator > > > > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > > > > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy > > :) > > >> Following the discussion > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > >> > > >> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer > > >> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June, > > >> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are > > >> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well. > > >> > > >> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows > > >> > > >> [1] S3ToHiveOperator > > >> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator > > >> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer > > >> [4] We do not care about consistency > > >> > > >> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1]. > > >> > > >> J. > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Jarek Potiuk > > >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer > > >> > > >> M: +48 660 796 129 > > >> > > > > >
