+1 for [1] XToYOperator
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:56 AM Arthur Wiedmer <arthur.wied...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for option 1 as well > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> > wrote: > > > Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :) > > Following the discussion > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > > > I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer > > operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June, > > 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are > > advised to vote with non-binding votes as well. > > > > The naming conventions we vote on are as follows > > > > [1] S3ToHiveOperator > > [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator > > [3] S3ToHiveTransfer > > [4] We do not care about consistency > > > > Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1]. > > > > J. > > > > > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > > Polidea | Principal Software Engineer > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 > >
