+1 for [1] XToYOperator Best Regards, Felix
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 13:58, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 for XToYOperator >> >> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak >> <basharens...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> > #1 -> XToYOperator >> > >> > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator >> > > >> > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy >> > :) >> > >> Following the discussion >> > >> >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E >> > >> >> > >> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer >> > >> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June, >> > >> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are >> > >> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well. >> > >> >> > >> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows >> > >> >> > >> [1] S3ToHiveOperator >> > >> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator >> > >> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer >> > >> [4] We do not care about consistency >> > >> >> > >> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1]. >> > >> >> > >> J. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Jarek Potiuk >> > >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer >> > >> >> > >> M: +48 660 796 129 >> > >> >> > >> > >>
