+1 for [1] XToYOperator On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 7:33 AM Felix Uellendall <felue...@pm.me.invalid> wrote:
> +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > Best Regards, > Felix > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 13:58, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> +1 for XToYOperator > >> > >> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak > >> <basharens...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> > #1 -> XToYOperator > >> > > >> > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > >> > > > >> > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much > controversy > >> > :) > >> > >> Following the discussion > >> > >> > >> > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > >> > >> > >> > >> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer > >> > >> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of > June, > >> > >> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members > are > >> > >> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well. > >> > >> > >> > >> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] S3ToHiveOperator > >> > >> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator > >> > >> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer > >> > >> [4] We do not care about consistency > >> > >> > >> > >> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1]. > >> > >> > >> > >> J. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Jarek Potiuk > >> > >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer > >> > >> > >> > >> M: +48 660 796 129 > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >>
