Crearted PR here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25564
On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 9:26 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > Free text field seems better for those. But we should make it required :) > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 1:40 AM Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> So far we've been talking about Airflow core bugs, but we do have 2 other >> issue templates that ask for the Airflow version - chart and providers. >> >> Both of those ultimately do support non-latest core versions, so I don't >> think we can be quite as blunt there. We either keep the full list or >> convert to a free text field. >> >> I don't have a strong preference here. Anyone have any thoughts? >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 5:44 PM Jeambrun Pierre <pierrejb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Same, great idea :) >>> >>> On Fri 5 Aug 2022 at 01:43, Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 on this approach with this approach in the PR >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25542 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 12:40 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Love it. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:28 PM Jed Cunningham < >>>>> jedcunning...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, coming to this a little late. I tend to agree with Elad that >>>>>> we might be better off not even having 2.0/2.1, and I'll go further that >>>>>> we >>>>>> should consider only listing main/latest/possibly n-1(e.g. 2.3.2). >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm also concerned only showing the latest in every minor may imply >>>>>> those are all getting bugfixes, while in fact only 2.3.x is. Plus, even >>>>>> if >>>>>> we tell people to upgrade to the latest 2.2.x version (2.2.5 from 2.2.2, >>>>>> for example) before reporting, the first thing we are going to ask in the >>>>>> issue is "what about 2.3.3/main?". >>>>>> >>>>>> Another option is a free test field instead, though this doesn't >>>>>> provide the subtle hint you are after. >>>>>> >>>>>> If we don't make it a free text field and don't enumerate all the >>>>>> versions, we almost certainly want an "other" option? I'd rather give >>>>>> them >>>>>> that escape hatch then have the wrong version in the easy to spot section >>>>>> and their real version hidden in a wall of text. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've opened this to take your change a bit further: >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25542 >>>>>> >>>>>
