No one on this thread owns that channel, so all we can do is leave it. The owner is ASF Infra.
-s On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gitter is fine and the public channel I linked to in the original > email is fine. It's functionally no different than IRC. The channel > just has to be open for any one rather than invite only. > > -Jakob > > > On 22 August 2016 at 13:10, Maxime Beauchemin > <maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think Gitter must have just transferred along as we moved the repo. I'm > > personally open to using IRC. > > > > Max > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Also who is the owner of this room? It seems created by Apache so they > >> (INFRA?) can set it to public? Logs will be public then by default. > >> > >> Wasn't there some discussion on a more relaxed requirement of this > >> happening on ASF infrastructure? > >> > >> Bolke. > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> > On 22 aug. 2016, at 20:29, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hey all- > >> > Apparently there is a private channel being used for project > >> > discussion on gitter (the archive would be here: > >> > https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/Airflow_ > >> committers/archives/all, > >> > similar to the public archive of the regular gitter channel: > >> > https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/archives/all), titled > >> > "Airflow_committers." > >> > > >> > As has been discussed before, all non-PMC level ASF communication > >> > *has* to be in a public accessible forum (preferably that is archived > >> > to an ASF list). Even if well intentioned, these channels are > >> > exclusionary and absolutely verboten per ASF. > >> > > >> > We need to open or shut that channel down and make sure we note this > >> > on the next IPMC report... > >> > > >> > -Jakob > >> >
