So we ask infra to make it public? Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 aug. 2016, at 04:02, siddharth anand <san...@apache.org> wrote: > > No one on this thread owns that channel, so all we can do is leave it. The > owner is ASF Infra. > > -s > >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Gitter is fine and the public channel I linked to in the original >> email is fine. It's functionally no different than IRC. The channel >> just has to be open for any one rather than invite only. >> >> -Jakob >> >> >> On 22 August 2016 at 13:10, Maxime Beauchemin >> <maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think Gitter must have just transferred along as we moved the repo. I'm >>> personally open to using IRC. >>> >>> Max >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Also who is the owner of this room? It seems created by Apache so they >>>> (INFRA?) can set it to public? Logs will be public then by default. >>>> >>>> Wasn't there some discussion on a more relaxed requirement of this >>>> happening on ASF infrastructure? >>>> >>>> Bolke. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On 22 aug. 2016, at 20:29, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey all- >>>>> Apparently there is a private channel being used for project >>>>> discussion on gitter (the archive would be here: >>>>> https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/Airflow_ >>>> committers/archives/all, >>>>> similar to the public archive of the regular gitter channel: >>>>> https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/archives/all), titled >>>>> "Airflow_committers." >>>>> >>>>> As has been discussed before, all non-PMC level ASF communication >>>>> *has* to be in a public accessible forum (preferably that is archived >>>>> to an ASF list). Even if well intentioned, these channels are >>>>> exclusionary and absolutely verboten per ASF. >>>>> >>>>> We need to open or shut that channel down and make sure we note this >>>>> on the next IPMC report... >>>>> >>>>> -Jakob >>
