Reinhard Poetz dijo:Could do. How efficient is XIndice? It would need to be pretty efficient on binary data too, as that is our primary use case.
AFAIK, we must move away from jisp. That was an ugly move! :-(Am 14:01 10.02.2004 -0500 schrieb Steve Krulewitz:As our store depends on Jisp - what does this mean for us? IMO we have
Does anyone know what happened to the jisp website? The old URLinvalid link.
http://www.coyotegulch.com/jisp/index.html sends you to an
It's back up now: http://www.coyotegulch.com/jisp/ I never went there before it went down, but it now has a version 3.0.0. That version isn't under the old license anymore but GPLed (or commercial for 2500$). Old versions I can't find there..
gunnar
ps: sorry if you get this mail twice, steve. small mistake by me.
--
G. Brand - interface:projects GmbH
to look for a replacement. Any ideas/hints?
Maybe this is a crazy idea but: Is posible to replace jisp with Apache
Xindice? Mainly because I have concerns for another ugly move (as jisp
did) if we choose a solution from a 3rd party again. If we use Apache
Xindice I think this cannot happen again.
With the new embedded mode driver for XIndice, it wouldn't be that hard to implement, so long as it is efficient enough.
Regards, Upayavira