Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Reinhard Poetz dijo:Could do. How efficient is XIndice? It would need to be pretty efficient on binary data too, as that is our primary use case.
Am 14:01 10.02.2004 -0500 schrieb Steve Krulewitz:
Does anyone know what happened to the jisp website? The old URL
http://www.coyotegulch.com/jisp/index.html sends you to an
invalid link.
It's back up now: http://www.coyotegulch.com/jisp/ I never went there before it went down, but it now has a version 3.0.0. That version isn't under the old license anymore but GPLed (or commercial for 2500$). Old versions I can't find there..
gunnar
ps: sorry if you get this mail twice, steve. small mistake by me.
--
G. Brand - interface:projects GmbH
As our store depends on Jisp - what does this mean for us? IMO we have
to look for a replacement. Any ideas/hints?
AFAIK, we must move away from jisp. That was an ugly move! :-(
Maybe this is a crazy idea but: Is posible to replace jisp with Apache
Xindice? Mainly because I have concerns for another ugly move (as jisp
did) if we choose a solution from a 3rd party again. If we use Apache
Xindice I think this cannot happen again.
With the new embedded mode driver for XIndice, it wouldn't be that hard to implement, so long as it is efficient enough.
I personally think it's a very bad idea. XIndice is not designed for these things. Carsten's suggestion seems *a lot* better!
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
