Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
...
+1 'cforms' instead of just 'forms'
I'm +1 for "forms" only - as Vadim pointed out, it's "Cocoon" is
obvious because it's within the Cocoon CVS.
WDOT?
Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a
little chat on IRC and agreed on the following:
Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0
Block Name: cforms
Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
NS Prefix: fd
Title goes to documentation, samples, wiki, etc. Package name "cforms"
and block name "cforms" will allow possibility of parallel development
of the next generation "Cocoon Forms 2.0" (block name dforms ;-)),
when/if it happens. Namespace suggests that Cocoon Forms 1.0 is one
and only official forms framework. Namespace prefix "fd" stands for
"forms definition".
Do we have a consensus now? Please chime in on IRC (somebody will have
to count votes then), or here :-)
Vadim
+1 from me!
--
Reinhard
