Marc Portier <mpo <at> outerthought.org> writes: > >> Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a > >> little chat on IRC and agreed on the following: > >> > >> Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0 > >> Block Name: cforms > >> Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms > >> Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0 > > sorry for missing the argumentation on keeping the 'forms' here, or is > this a typo?
AFAIU it this is by intention, no typo. It means the implementation of a new form framework can happen in a parallel block, but the namespace always points to *the* form framework. For a new framework accepted as replacement for Woody later on the namespace will just change to 2.0. +1 from me for the proposal (no IRC possible from here) Joerg
