Re: [SUMMARY] From Woody to Cocoon Forms 1.0

[Vadim Gritsenko]

Joerg Heinicke wrote:

Marc Portier <mpo <at> outerthought.org> writes:

 

Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a 
little chat on IRC and agreed on the following:

 Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0
 Block Name: cforms
 Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
 Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
       

sorry for missing the argumentation on keeping the 'forms' here, or is 
this a typo?
   

AFAIU it this is by intention, no typo. It means the implementation of a new
 

Yes, no typo. Cocoon Forms 1.0 is the one and only form framework for 
Cocoon at the moment. Thus namespace is ...cocoon/forms/.../1.0 Once we 
have new-kid-on-the-block replacement for the Cocoon Forms 1.0, it will 
be named Cocoon Forms 2.0 and have namespace .../cocoon/forms/.../2.0


form framework can happen in a parallel block, but the namespace always points
to *the* form framework. For a new framework accepted as replacement for Woody
later on the namespace will just change to 2.0.
+1 from me for the proposal (no IRC possible from here)

Joerg



Vadim