Hi Simo, Send from my mobile device
Am 17.03.2013 um 11:05 schrieb Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>: > Hi Steve! > > I have to dig in the ML to find the discussion, anyway IIRC the > CatalogFactory has been designed to be integrated in the XML/textual > configuration, mixing a lot of pattern - not in the best way. > With new Configuration design, we thought delegating the config > implementation to resolve commands class name to instance, Resolving classes by name will cause problems with OSGi. Are there other possibilities to configure [chain]? Sorry I haven't looked at the sources yet, but will do asap. I'm interested in getting involved in the development of this component. Regards, Benedikt > rather than > having this god class... > > I'll point you to discussions anyway as soon as I find it! > > Have a nice weekend, all the best! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Steve Westwood > <steve.westw...@hexsaw.org.uk> wrote: >> Hi Simone, >> >> Thanks for this - happy to take a closer look a.s.a.p. However, what >> were/are yours and Elijahs issues with the CatalogFactory? >> >> Regards, >> >> Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf >> Of Simone Tripodi >> Sent: 16 March 2013 21:04 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [Chain] Any future plans for commons-chain? >> >> Hi again Steve, >> >> another thing that came in my mind, is about a discussion between Elijah and >> I about dropping completely the CatalogFactory and moving the >> ChainConfigurationException to the configuration API module. >> IIRC this is still related to CHAIN-76... >> >> TIA! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> thanks a lot for your interest on chains! :) >>> >>> Documentation is never enough, so if you do have some more >>> samples/hints/.../whatever, feel free to push one or more patches on >>> JIRA, I'd be more than glad to apply it! >>> Same thing for unit tests, or improve the test coverage - patches are >>> more than welcome, and playing with tests is usually a good way to get >>> familiar with codebase :) >>> >>> Thanks a lot in advance for your involvement, hope to read from you soon! >>> Have a nice day, all the best, >>> -Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Steve Westwood >>> <steve.westw...@hexsaw.org.uk> wrote: >>>> Hi Simone, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the response; >>>> >>>> My first thought on commons-chain relate to the other 2.0 issues >>>> apart from >>>> CHAIN-76 that have been delivered (which is a lot I notice - >>>> congratulations on getting to this point!). Are the changes in your >>>> view stable and do they need further tests/samples to ensure all is >>>> good (I haven't looked at test coverage yet). I notice cookbook >>>> sample changes (CHAIN-66) but do we need to provide more (plus amend >>>> documentation) to provide certainty going forward? I guess my >>>> thinking relates to whether work such as CHAIN-76 is a >>>> 2.0 or 2.1 issue. I have no strong view on this although a move away >>>> from XML-centric configuration is certainly desirable. >>>> >>>> For CHAIN-76, I will apply the prototype patch to a copy of the 2.0 >>>> over the weekend and take a closer look at what you submitted. I need >>>> to refresh my memory on commons-chain (its been a while...) but I >>>> like to think I can get up to speed fairly quickly here. >>>> >>>> Thanks again, >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> >>>> From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On >>>> Behalf Of Simone Tripodi >>>> >>>> Sent: 13 March 2013 20:01 >>>> >>>> To: Commons Developers List; Steve Westwood >>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [Chain] Any future plans for commons-chain? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Steve, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> very nice to hear there is someone willing to put new energies on >>>> Chain! :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So, the latest step IMHO before to cut the first chain RC, is >>>> CHAIN-76[1] where some work has already been done but far to be completed. >>>> >>>> If you want to give a help here, there's enough space to get involved >>>> >>>> - I would be more than pleased to revamp my interest in Chains :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I hope to read from you soon! >>>> >>>> All the best! >>>> >>>> -Simo >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-76 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Steve Westwood >>>> <steve.westw...@hexsaw.org.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wanted to get a sense of what (if anything) is planned for >>>> >>>>> commons-chain. I used this in some years ago, and for various >>>>> reasons >>>> >>>>> I now find myself returning to it. In examining the SVN trunk things >>>>> have not stood still: >>>> >>>>> - Discussions (and subsequent work) in 2011 to accommodate work as a >>>> >>>>> precursor to a chains2 from of CHAIN-53 >>>> >>>>> - A fair bit of rework to accommodate Generics/Java 5 support >>>> >>>>> - DSL like capability introduced >>>> >>>>> - Refactoring >>>> >>>> >>>>> Of course, the last release was 2008 (1.2), hence is 2.0 imminent, >>>>> or >>>> >>>>> are there other issues that require addressing prior to its roll-out? >>>> >>>>> I have looked at JIRA, and I am aware of some debates via this list >>>> >>>>> back in 2009 regarding the incorporation of aspects of Robust-Task >>>> >>>>> from Min Cha (this has morphed into Whitetask - see >>>> >>>>> https://code.google.com/p/whitetask/). In addition I note >>>>> guice/spring integration has been raised in some form. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hence what are the next steps for commons-chain? I am more than >>>>> happy >>>> >>>>> to get involved with this. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> >>>>> Steve Westwood >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
