Hi Christian, Simone and others are better placed to comment on this. I will certainly take a look at the repo, but are you able to provide a brief summary of the differences between this and common-chains?
Regards, Steve > On 20 March 2013 at 19:22 Christian T Trimble > <christian.trim...@meltmedia.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I am not sure where you are looking to take the commons chain project, but you > may be interested > in some code that meltmedia has open sourced. The project is called xchain and > it fuses the > Commons JXPath project with Commons Chain to be used as a web framework. You > can find the code up > on GitHub. This is a dump of the head of our repository, so unfortunately it > does not contain history or much documentation. > > Project on GitHub: https://github.com/ctrimble/xchain > Core Package: > https://github.com/ctrimble/xchain/tree/master/core/src/main/java/org/xchain > > If anyone is interested in this code, let me know and I will put some effort > into the documentation. > > -Christian > -- > Christian Trimble > Software Architect > meltmedia.com | @meltmedia | @xiantrimble > c: 480.430.2854 | w: 602.340.9440 > -- > meltmedia > We are Interactive Superheroes > > > > On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:53 AM, Steve Westwood wrote: > > > Hi Simone, > > > > Thanks for the response; > > > > My first thought on commons-chain relate to the other 2.0 issues apart from > > CHAIN-76 that have been delivered (which is a lot I notice - congratulations > > on > > getting to this point!). Are the changes in your view stable and do they > > need > > further tests/samples to ensure all is good (I haven't looked at test > > coverage > > yet). I notice cookbook sample changes (CHAIN-66) but do we need to provide > > more (plus amend documentation) to provide certainty going forward? I guess > > my > > thinking relates to whether work such as CHAIN-76 is a 2.0 or 2.1 issue. I > > have > > no strong view on this although a move away from XML-centric configuration > > is > > certainly desirable. > > > > For CHAIN-76, I will apply the prototype patch to a copy of the 2.0 over the > > weekend and take a closer look at what you submitted. I need to refresh my > > memory on commons-chain (its been a while...) but I like to think I can get > > up > > to speed fairly quickly here. > > > > Thanks again, > > > > Steve > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf > > Of > > Simone Tripodi > > > > Sent: 13 March 2013 20:01 > > > > To: Commons Developers List; Steve Westwood > > > > Subject: Re: [Chain] Any future plans for commons-chain? > > > > > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > > > > > very nice to hear there is someone willing to put new energies on Chain! :) > > > > > > > > So, the latest step IMHO before to cut the first chain RC, is CHAIN-76[1] > > where > > some work has already been done but far to be completed. > > > > If you want to give a help here, there's enough space to get involved > > > > - I would be more than pleased to revamp my interest in Chains :) > > > > > > > > I hope to read from you soon! > > > > All the best! > > > > -Simo > > > > > > > > [1]<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-76> > > > > > > <http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/><http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/><http://twitter.com/simonetripodi><http://www.99soft.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Steve Westwood > > <steve.westw...@hexsaw.org.uk > > <mailto:steve.westw...@hexsaw.org.uk> > wrote: > > > >> I wanted to get a sense of what (if anything) is planned for > > > >> commons-chain. I used this in some years ago, and for various reasons > > > >> I now find myself returning to it. In examining the SVN trunk things have > >> not > >> stood still: > > > >> - Discussions (and subsequent work) in 2011 to accommodate work as a > > > >> precursor to a chains2 from of CHAIN-53 > > > >> - A fair bit of rework to accommodate Generics/Java 5 support > > > >> - DSL like capability introduced > > > >> - Refactoring > > > >> > > > >> Of course, the last release was 2008 (1.2), hence is 2.0 imminent, or > > > >> are there other issues that require addressing prior to its roll-out? > > > >> I have looked at JIRA, and I am aware of some debates via this list > > > >> back in 2009 regarding the incorporation of aspects of Robust-Task > > > >> from Min Cha (this has morphed into Whitetask - see > > > >> <https://code.google.com/p/whitetask/> ). In addition I note guice/spring > >> integration has been raised in some form. > > > >> > > > >> Hence what are the next steps for commons-chain? I am more than happy > > > >> to get involved with this. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> Steve Westwood > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > <mailto:dev-h...@commons.apache.org> > > > > > > >
