I have created an issue to keep track of the registry refactor. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5130
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > I added some validation for plugin names (to follow > reverse-domain-name convention) a couple of weeks ago but there needs > to be more of it for sure. > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I have created an issue to track the meta tag addition. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5128 > > > > I agree with doing validation with plugman during publish time. We should > > decide soon which ones are going to be mandatory and which ones will be > > optional. Probably update the plugin spec + our docs around creating > > plugins as well. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Perhaps either plugman or the registry should do some validation, and > have > >> some "required" fields? I know that PhoneGap Build when you try to > submit a > >> plugin they error out if you are missing some fields that they require. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.er...@gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > +1 for adding metadata but should more of the metadata be compulsory? > >> > > >> > JBoss tools plugin discovery uses the cordova.io registry and some > of > >> the > >> > plugins are missing a lot to. http://snag.gy/aAxjL.jpg is a > screenshot > >> > that shows how the case. http://snag.gy/J8rl6.jpg is a screenshot of > a > >> few > >> > plugins that has most of its data. As you can see with the missing > >> > descriptions etc. it is not possible to do an informed decision on > >> whether > >> > to use a plugin or not. Although information such as keywords does not > >> seem > >> > like important it becomes quite useful when you are trying to find a > >> > certain plugin. > >> > -- > >> > Gorkem > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 to repo / issue / website / docs etc metadata > >> > > > >> > > -1 *for now* to dependencies at specific versions, and testing > related > >> > > changes like <mode>, just because its not clear what the right > solution > >> > to > >> > > these problems is. We do need to address it, but those topics will > >> > likely > >> > > move to separate discussions. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Lucas Holmquist < > lholm...@redhat.com > >> > > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > i was just thinking the same thing :) > >> > > > On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Carlos Santana < > csantan...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > plugin.xml metadata is looking more and more like a package.json > >> > (i.e. > >> > > > npm) > >> > > > > ;-p > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Steve Gill < > >> stevengil...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> Yes I meant plugins.xml > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:43 AM, Lucas Holmquist < > >> lholm...@redhat.com> > >> > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>>> On Oct 17, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Steven Gill < > >> stevengil...@gmail.com> > >> > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> So looks like want to to start including more data on > >> > > > >>>> http://plugins.cordova.io. > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> Repo tag -> points to repo where plugin lives > >> > > > >>>> Issue tag -> points to issue tracker (with component for > jira) > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> Testing related (can get discussed more in testing thread > >> > > > >>>> Mode tag -> to differentiate between testing mode and normal > >> mode > >> > > > >>>> JS module tag for test module > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> Dependency related > >> > > > >>>> adding version number to dependency tags so they don't just > grab > >> > > > latest > >> > > > >>>> always. Multiple approaches were discussed and this > discussion > >> > > should > >> > > > >>>> probably happen in a new thread. > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> Thoughts on above? Suggestions for other meta data we should > >> look > >> > > into > >> > > > >>>> adding to config.xml? > >> > > > >>> did you mean plugin.xml? > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Carlos Santana > >> > > > > <csantan...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
