I’ve ran the mobile-spec tests on android 4.0.3 with 4.0.x and there are some
failures. I’ve searched the jira for issues but wasn’t able to find any. Has
anyone else ran into these issues before?
org.apache.cordova.contacts.tests.tests >> Contacts (navigator.contacts) Round
trip Contact tests (creating + save + delete + find). Contacts.spec.24
Creating, saving, finding a contact should work, after which we should not be
able to find it, and we should not be able to delete it again.
• Expected 2 to be 1
• Expected 1 to be 0
it("contacts.spec.24 Creating, saving, finding a contact should work,
removing it should work, after which we should not be able to find it, and we
should not be able to delete it again.", function (done) {
// Save method is not supported on Windows platform
if (isWindows) {
pending();
return;
}
if (isWindowsPhone8) {
done();
return;
}
gContactObj = new Contact();
gContactObj.name = new ContactName();
gContactObj.name.familyName = "DeleteMe";
gContactObj.save(function(c_obj) {
var findWin = function(cs) {
expect(cs.length).toBe(1);
// update to have proper saved id
gContactObj = cs[0];
gContactObj.remove(function() {
var findWinAgain = function(seas) {
expect(seas.length).toBe(0);
gContactObj.remove(function() {
throw("success callback called after
non-existent Contact object called remove(). Test failed.");
}, function(e) {
expect(e.code).toBe(ContactError.UNKNOWN_ERROR);
done();
});
};
var findFailAgain = function(e) {
throw("find error callback invoked after delete,
test failed.");
};
var obj = new ContactFindOptions();
obj.filter="DeleteMe";
obj.multiple=true;
navigator.contacts.find(["displayName", "name",
"phoneNumbers", "emails"], findWinAgain, findFailAgain, obj);
}, function(e) {
throw("Newly created contact's remove function
invoked error callback. Test failed.");
});
};
var findFail = fail;
var obj = new ContactFindOptions();
obj.filter="DeleteMe";
obj.multiple=true;
navigator.contacts.find(["displayName", "name",
"phoneNumbers", "emails"], findWin, findFail, obj);
}, fail);
});
org.apache.cordova.file.tests.test >> file api filereader file.spec.81
(couldn’t find a JIRA issue)
• Expected `` to be null
describe('FileReader', function () {
it("file.spec.81 should have correct methods", function () {
var reader = new FileReader();
expect(reader).toBeDefined();
expect(typeof reader.readAsBinaryString).toBe('function');
expect(typeof reader.readAsDataURL).toBe('function');
expect(typeof reader.readAsText).toBe('function');
expect(typeof reader.readAsArrayBuffer).toBe('function');
expect(typeof reader.abort).toBe('function');
//////////// test below fails ////////////
//////////// '' !== null ////////////
expect(reader.result).toBe(null);
});
});
org.apache.cordova.file.tests.tests >> file api parent references file.spec.111
(couldn’t find a fire issue):
• root.getFile succeeds, it is expected to fail.
var fileName = "traverse.file.uri";
// create a new file entry
createFile(fileName, function (entry) {
// lookup file system entry
root.getFile('../' + fileName, {
create : false
}, succeed.bind(null, done, "root.getFile('../"+fileName+
"')- Unexpected success callback, it should not traverse abvoe the root
directory"),
function (error) { //.....
org.apache.cordova.file-transfer.tests.tests >> FileTransfer methods download
filetransfer.spec.6 should get 401 status on http basic auth failure
• Expected null to be 401
it('filetransfer.spec.6 should get 401 status on http basic
auth failure', function (done) {
// NOTE:
// using server without credentials
var fileURL = SERVER + '/download_basic_auth';
var downloadFail = function (error) {
expect(error.http_status).toBe(401);
expect(error.http_status).not.toBe(404, "Ensure " +
fileURL + " is in the white list");
done();
};
transfer.download(fileURL, localFilePath,
unexpectedCallbacks.httpWin, downloadFail);
});
org.apache.cordova.geolocation.tests.tests >> getCurrentPosition method success
callback geolocation.spec.6 should be called with a position object
• Expected true to be false
it("geolocation.spec.6 should be called with a Position object",
function (done) {
// this test asks for using geolocation and interrupts
autotests running.
// That's why we have to pending that for Windows Store 8.0/8.1
apps
if (isWindowsStore) {
pending();
}
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function (p) {
expect(p.coords).toBeDefined();
expect(p.timestamp).toBeDefined();
done();
},
fail.bind(null, done),
{
maximumAge: 300000 // 5 minutes maximum age of cached
position
});
});
org.apache.cordova.geolocation.tests.tests >> watchPosition method success
callback geolocation.spec.8 should be called with a position object
• Expected true to be false
it("geolocation.spec.8 should be called with a Position object",
function (done) {
// this test asks for using geolocation and interrupts
autotests running.
// That's why we have to pending that for Windows Store 8.0/8.1
apps
if (isWindowsStore) {
pending();
}
successWatch = navigator.geolocation.watchPosition(
function (p) {
expect(p.coords).toBeDefined();
expect(p.timestamp).toBeDefined();
done();
},
fail.bind(null, done),
{
maximumAge: (5 * 60 * 1000) // 5 minutes maximum age of
cached position
});
});
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Bavari [mailto:jbav...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 8:30 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 4.0.0 Release
Joe and team,
I work for Ionic and I've had some involvement with the Cordova project since
last year. At Ionic, we've released a Crosswalk build using Cordova Android 4.0
so we can use the cordova crosswalk engine for the ionic platform.
I've been working with Ian and Andrew on this to gather more understanding and
to get some help along the way. I must say, excellent work, everyone.
As such, we've accumulated quite a bit of users who are actively using Cordova
Android 4.0. Currently, we've had over 10k test trials with it, and I'm happy
to say, mostly it's been smooth.
What I've done is made a fork to adjust a few small things, but for the most
part, we're using 4.0.
I'd love to provide any more feedback that you'd wish.
Thanks again for the awesome work.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey
>
> So, it's finally here. I want to see us work more on Pluggable
> Webviews, and adding the API, but I think it's time that we released
> what we've been working on for almost a year to our users. I know
> that the API isn't exactly the most awesome we can make it, but it
> works, and I'd rather have it out at 80% than it sitting for a few more
> months in limbo.
>
> Are there any major blocking tasks that would prevent a vote thread
> that anyone knows about, or should we start firing up a release? I
> don't think we're going to make our January date, but the first week
> of February isn't that terrible.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Joe
>
--
"Clear thoughts produce clear results."
Josh Bavari
Application Developer
Phone: 405-509-9448
Cell: 405-812-0496
Email: jbav...@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
