Things i think we should still wait for:
- Ian's been working on getting crosswalk 10 working and is hitting some
FileTransfer crash issues.
- Mobilespec really should be passing, let's investigate and fix plugins /
tests if they are the issues.
- Android's update script is not preserving artifacts of <framework
type="gradleReference"/> (hoping to work on this today)
- *LinearLayoutSoftKeyboardDetect - delete it!*
- Ensure that our gradle support is to the point where plugins can target
android-sdk-provided libs (play services & -compat libs)
- Make CordovaActivity not implement CordovaInterface, but instead provide
CordovaInterface via an inner class (to solidify that you can't cast the
activity to CordovaInterface and expect that to work - some used to do this
but I think we've cleaned it all up now)
All of this can be done in a few days, but I'd also like to see the dust
settle a bit before going forward with 4.0.0 release. E.g. At least wait
until we do a blog post for 3.7.0 (are you doing this?), and have done a
tools release that updates the pinned version to 3.7.0
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Reminder: failures with plugins are not blockers. I've run into that
> contact issue numerous times when testing with my personal device. I
> recommend making sure that your contacts are completely clean so that you
> don't get these weird results.
>
> The file failures have been happening for quite a while, and those are not
> blockers for the platform release either. Do these failures happen on a
> platform other than ICS?
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 9:06 AM Murat Sutunc <mura...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > I’ve ran the mobile-spec tests on android 4.0.3 with 4.0.x and there are
> > some failures. I’ve searched the jira for issues but wasn’t able to find
> > any. Has anyone else ran into these issues before?
> >
> > org.apache.cordova.contacts.tests.tests >> Contacts (navigator.contacts)
> > Round trip Contact tests (creating + save + delete + find).
> > Contacts.spec.24 Creating, saving, finding a contact should work, after
> > which we should not be able to find it, and we should not be able to
> delete
> > it again.
> > • Expected 2 to be 1
> > • Expected 1 to be 0
> > it("contacts.spec.24 Creating, saving, finding a contact should
> > work, removing it should work, after which we should not be able to find
> > it, and we should not be able to delete it again.", function (done) {
> > // Save method is not supported on Windows platform
> > if (isWindows) {
> > pending();
> > return;
> > }
> > if (isWindowsPhone8) {
> > done();
> > return;
> > }
> > gContactObj = new Contact();
> > gContactObj.name = new ContactName();
> > gContactObj.name.familyName = "DeleteMe";
> > gContactObj.save(function(c_obj) {
> > var findWin = function(cs) {
> > expect(cs.length).toBe(1);
> > // update to have proper saved id
> > gContactObj = cs[0];
> > gContactObj.remove(function() {
> > var findWinAgain = function(seas) {
> > expect(seas.length).toBe(0);
> > gContactObj.remove(function() {
> > throw("success callback called after
> > non-existent Contact object called remove(). Test failed.");
> > }, function(e) {
> > expect(e.code).toBe(ContactErr
> > or.UNKNOWN_ERROR);
> > done();
> > });
> > };
> > var findFailAgain = function(e) {
> > throw("find error callback invoked after
> > delete, test failed.");
> > };
> > var obj = new ContactFindOptions();
> > obj.filter="DeleteMe";
> > obj.multiple=true;
> > navigator.contacts.find(["displayName", "name",
> > "phoneNumbers", "emails"], findWinAgain, findFailAgain, obj);
> > }, function(e) {
> > throw("Newly created contact's remove function
> > invoked error callback. Test failed.");
> > });
> > };
> > var findFail = fail;
> > var obj = new ContactFindOptions();
> > obj.filter="DeleteMe";
> > obj.multiple=true;
> > navigator.contacts.find(["displayName", "name",
> > "phoneNumbers", "emails"], findWin, findFail, obj);
> > }, fail);
> > });
> >
> > org.apache.cordova.file.tests.test >> file api filereader file.spec.81
> > (couldn’t find a JIRA issue)
> > • Expected `` to be null
> > describe('FileReader', function () {
> > it("file.spec.81 should have correct methods", function () {
> > var reader = new FileReader();
> > expect(reader).toBeDefined();
> > expect(typeof
> reader.readAsBinaryString).toBe('function');
> > expect(typeof reader.readAsDataURL).toBe('function');
> > expect(typeof reader.readAsText).toBe('function');
> > expect(typeof reader.readAsArrayBuffer).toBe('function');
> > expect(typeof reader.abort).toBe('function');
> > //////////// test below fails ////////////
> > //////////// '' !== null ////////////
> > expect(reader.result).toBe(null);
> > });
> > });
> >
> > org.apache.cordova.file.tests.tests >> file api parent references
> > file.spec.111 (couldn’t find a fire issue):
> > • root.getFile succeeds, it is expected to fail.
> > var fileName = "traverse.file.uri";
> > // create a new file entry
> > createFile(fileName, function (entry) {
> > // lookup file system entry
> > root.getFile('../' + fileName, {
> > create : false
> > }, succeed.bind(null, done,
> > "root.getFile('../"+fileName+ "')- Unexpected success callback, it should
> > not traverse abvoe the root directory"),
> > function (error) { //.....
> >
> > org.apache.cordova.file-transfer.tests.tests >> FileTransfer methods
> > download filetransfer.spec.6 should get 401 status on http basic auth
> > failure
> > • Expected null to be 401
> > it('filetransfer.spec.6 should get 401 status on http
> > basic auth failure', function (done) {
> >
> > // NOTE:
> > // using server without credentials
> > var fileURL = SERVER + '/download_basic_auth';
> >
> > var downloadFail = function (error) {
> > expect(error.http_status).toBe(401);
> > expect(error.http_status).not.toBe(404, "Ensure "
> > + fileURL + " is in the white list");
> > done();
> > };
> >
> > transfer.download(fileURL, localFilePath,
> > unexpectedCallbacks.httpWin, downloadFail);
> > });
> >
> > org.apache.cordova.geolocation.tests.tests >> getCurrentPosition method
> > success callback geolocation.spec.6 should be called with a position
> object
> > • Expected true to be false
> > it("geolocation.spec.6 should be called with a Position
> > object", function (done) {
> > // this test asks for using geolocation and interrupts
> > autotests running.
> > // That's why we have to pending that for Windows Store
> > 8.0/8.1 apps
> > if (isWindowsStore) {
> > pending();
> > }
> > navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function (p) {
> > expect(p.coords).toBeDefined();
> > expect(p.timestamp).toBeDefined();
> > done();
> > },
> > fail.bind(null, done),
> > {
> > maximumAge: 300000 // 5 minutes maximum age of cached
> > position
> > });
> > });
> >
> > org.apache.cordova.geolocation.tests.tests >> watchPosition method
> > success callback geolocation.spec.8 should be called with a position
> object
> > • Expected true to be false
> > it("geolocation.spec.8 should be called with a Position
> > object", function (done) {
> > // this test asks for using geolocation and interrupts
> > autotests running.
> > // That's why we have to pending that for Windows Store
> > 8.0/8.1 apps
> > if (isWindowsStore) {
> > pending();
> > }
> > successWatch = navigator.geolocation.watchPosition(
> > function (p) {
> > expect(p.coords).toBeDefined();
> > expect(p.timestamp).toBeDefined();
> > done();
> > },
> > fail.bind(null, done),
> > {
> > maximumAge: (5 * 60 * 1000) // 5 minutes maximum
> > age of cached position
> > });
> > });
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Josh Bavari [mailto:jbav...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 8:30 AM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 4.0.0 Release
> >
> > Joe and team,
> >
> > I work for Ionic and I've had some involvement with the Cordova project
> > since last year. At Ionic, we've released a Crosswalk build using Cordova
> > Android 4.0 so we can use the cordova crosswalk engine for the ionic
> > platform.
> >
> > I've been working with Ian and Andrew on this to gather more
> understanding
> > and to get some help along the way. I must say, excellent work, everyone.
> >
> > As such, we've accumulated quite a bit of users who are actively using
> > Cordova Android 4.0. Currently, we've had over 10k test trials with it,
> and
> > I'm happy to say, mostly it's been smooth.
> >
> > What I've done is made a fork to adjust a few small things, but for the
> > most part, we're using 4.0.
> >
> > I'd love to provide any more feedback that you'd wish.
> >
> > Thanks again for the awesome work.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey
> > >
> > > So, it's finally here. I want to see us work more on Pluggable
> > > Webviews, and adding the API, but I think it's time that we released
> > > what we've been working on for almost a year to our users. I know
> > > that the API isn't exactly the most awesome we can make it, but it
> > > works, and I'd rather have it out at 80% than it sitting for a few more
> > months in limbo.
> > >
> > > Are there any major blocking tasks that would prevent a vote thread
> > > that anyone knows about, or should we start firing up a release? I
> > > don't think we're going to make our January date, but the first week
> > > of February isn't that terrible.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Clear thoughts produce clear results."
> > Josh Bavari
> > Application Developer
> > Phone: 405-509-9448
> > Cell: 405-812-0496
> > Email: jbav...@gmail.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
> >
>
