On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 10:38:07 AM Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > - Make CordovaActivity not implement CordovaInterface, but instead
> provide
> > CordovaInterface via an inner class (to solidify that you can't cast the
> > activity to CordovaInterface and expect that to work - some used to do
> this
> > but I think we've cleaned it all up now)
> >
> > This literally came out of nowhere. Why are you trying so hard to remove
> the embedded view use case? What if someone is implementing an activity
> that inherits from another activity like MapActivity? This API change came
> without any discussion.
>
I meant for this to be discussion. Certainly this is non-critical, but I
think it makes the embedded use-case easier not harder. Will do it in a PR
for review.
>
> All of this can be done in a few days, but I'd also like to see the dust
> > settle a bit before going forward with 4.0.0 release. E.g. At least wait
> > until we do a blog post for 3.7.0 (are you doing this?), and have done a
> > tools release that updates the pinned version to 3.7.0
> >
> >
> If someone else wants to do the blog post on that, that's fine. And I
> agree that there should be a tools release with 3.7.0 pinned, even though
> 3.7.0 is really just a technicality so we can get 4.0.0 out IMO.
>
3.7.0 adds Lollipop support. That's pretty big! I won't have time to get to
it this week if there are any other takers?
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Reminder: failures with plugins are not blockers. I've run into that
> > > contact issue numerous times when testing with my personal device. I
> > > recommend making sure that your contacts are completely clean so that
> you
> > > don't get these weird results.
> > >
> > > The file failures have been happening for quite a while, and those are
> > not
> > > blockers for the platform release either. Do these failures happen on
> a
> > > platform other than ICS?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 9:06 AM Murat Sutunc <mura...@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I’ve ran the mobile-spec tests on android 4.0.3 with 4.0.x and there
> > are
> > > > some failures. I’ve searched the jira for issues but wasn’t able to
> > find
> > > > any. Has anyone else ran into these issues before?
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.cordova.contacts.tests.tests >> Contacts
> > (navigator.contacts)
> > > > Round trip Contact tests (creating + save + delete + find).
> > > > Contacts.spec.24 Creating, saving, finding a contact should work,
> after
> > > > which we should not be able to find it, and we should not be able to
> > > delete
> > > > it again.
> > > > • Expected 2 to be 1
> > > > • Expected 1 to be 0
> > > > it("contacts.spec.24 Creating, saving, finding a contact
> > should
> > > > work, removing it should work, after which we should not be able to
> > find
> > > > it, and we should not be able to delete it again.", function (done) {
> > > > // Save method is not supported on Windows platform
> > > > if (isWindows) {
> > > > pending();
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > > if (isWindowsPhone8) {
> > > > done();
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > > gContactObj = new Contact();
> > > > gContactObj.name = new ContactName();
> > > > gContactObj.name.familyName = "DeleteMe";
> > > > gContactObj.save(function(c_obj) {
> > > > var findWin = function(cs) {
> > > > expect(cs.length).toBe(1);
> > > > // update to have proper saved id
> > > > gContactObj = cs[0];
> > > > gContactObj.remove(function() {
> > > > var findWinAgain = function(seas) {
> > > > expect(seas.length).toBe(0);
> > > > gContactObj.remove(function() {
> > > > throw("success callback called
> after
> > > > non-existent Contact object called remove(). Test failed.");
> > > > }, function(e) {
> > > > expect(e.code).toBe(ContactErr
> > > > or.UNKNOWN_ERROR);
> > > > done();
> > > > });
> > > > };
> > > > var findFailAgain = function(e) {
> > > > throw("find error callback invoked
> after
> > > > delete, test failed.");
> > > > };
> > > > var obj = new ContactFindOptions();
> > > > obj.filter="DeleteMe";
> > > > obj.multiple=true;
> > > > navigator.contacts.find(["displayName",
> > "name",
> > > > "phoneNumbers", "emails"], findWinAgain, findFailAgain, obj);
> > > > }, function(e) {
> > > > throw("Newly created contact's remove
> > function
> > > > invoked error callback. Test failed.");
> > > > });
> > > > };
> > > > var findFail = fail;
> > > > var obj = new ContactFindOptions();
> > > > obj.filter="DeleteMe";
> > > > obj.multiple=true;
> > > > navigator.contacts.find(["displayName", "name",
> > > > "phoneNumbers", "emails"], findWin, findFail, obj);
> > > > }, fail);
> > > > });
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.cordova.file.tests.test >> file api filereader
> file.spec.81
> > > > (couldn’t find a JIRA issue)
> > > > • Expected `` to be null
> > > > describe('FileReader', function () {
> > > > it("file.spec.81 should have correct methods", function
> ()
> > {
> > > > var reader = new FileReader();
> > > > expect(reader).toBeDefined();
> > > > expect(typeof
> > > reader.readAsBinaryString).toBe('function');
> > > > expect(typeof reader.readAsDataURL).toBe('function');
> > > > expect(typeof reader.readAsText).toBe('function');
> > > > expect(typeof reader.readAsArrayBuffer).
> > toBe('function');
> > > > expect(typeof reader.abort).toBe('function');
> > > > //////////// test below fails ////////////
> > > > //////////// '' !== null ////////////
> > > > expect(reader.result).toBe(null);
> > > > });
> > > > });
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.cordova.file.tests.tests >> file api parent references
> > > > file.spec.111 (couldn’t find a fire issue):
> > > > • root.getFile succeeds, it is expected to fail.
> > > > var fileName = "traverse.file.uri";
> > > > // create a new file entry
> > > > createFile(fileName, function (entry) {
> > > > // lookup file system entry
> > > > root.getFile('../' + fileName, {
> > > > create : false
> > > > }, succeed.bind(null, done,
> > > > "root.getFile('../"+fileName+ "')- Unexpected success callback, it
> > should
> > > > not traverse abvoe the root directory"),
> > > > function (error) { //.....
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.cordova.file-transfer.tests.tests >> FileTransfer methods
> > > > download filetransfer.spec.6 should get 401 status on http basic auth
> > > > failure
> > > > • Expected null to be 401
> > > > it('filetransfer.spec.6 should get 401 status on http
> > > > basic auth failure', function (done) {
> > > >
> > > > // NOTE:
> > > > // using server without credentials
> > > > var fileURL = SERVER + '/download_basic_auth';
> > > >
> > > > var downloadFail = function (error) {
> > > > expect(error.http_status).toBe(401);
> > > > expect(error.http_status).not.toBe(404,
> > "Ensure "
> > > > + fileURL + " is in the white list");
> > > > done();
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > transfer.download(fileURL, localFilePath,
> > > > unexpectedCallbacks.httpWin, downloadFail);
> > > > });
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.cordova.geolocation.tests.tests >> getCurrentPosition
> > method
> > > > success callback geolocation.spec.6 should be called with a position
> > > object
> > > > • Expected true to be false
> > > > it("geolocation.spec.6 should be called with a Position
> > > > object", function (done) {
> > > > // this test asks for using geolocation and
> interrupts
> > > > autotests running.
> > > > // That's why we have to pending that for Windows
> Store
> > > > 8.0/8.1 apps
> > > > if (isWindowsStore) {
> > > > pending();
> > > > }
> > > > navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function (p)
> > {
> > > > expect(p.coords).toBeDefined();
> > > > expect(p.timestamp).toBeDefined();
> > > > done();
> > > > },
> > > > fail.bind(null, done),
> > > > {
> > > > maximumAge: 300000 // 5 minutes maximum age of
> > cached
> > > > position
> > > > });
> > > > });
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.cordova.geolocation.tests.tests >> watchPosition method
> > > > success callback geolocation.spec.8 should be called with a position
> > > object
> > > > • Expected true to be false
> > > > it("geolocation.spec.8 should be called with a Position
> > > > object", function (done) {
> > > > // this test asks for using geolocation and
> interrupts
> > > > autotests running.
> > > > // That's why we have to pending that for Windows
> Store
> > > > 8.0/8.1 apps
> > > > if (isWindowsStore) {
> > > > pending();
> > > > }
> > > > successWatch = navigator.geolocation.watchPosition(
> > > > function (p) {
> > > > expect(p.coords).toBeDefined();
> > > > expect(p.timestamp).toBeDefined();
> > > > done();
> > > > },
> > > > fail.bind(null, done),
> > > > {
> > > > maximumAge: (5 * 60 * 1000) // 5 minutes
> > maximum
> > > > age of cached position
> > > > });
> > > > });
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Josh Bavari [mailto:jbav...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 8:30 AM
> > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 4.0.0 Release
> > > >
> > > > Joe and team,
> > > >
> > > > I work for Ionic and I've had some involvement with the Cordova
> project
> > > > since last year. At Ionic, we've released a Crosswalk build using
> > Cordova
> > > > Android 4.0 so we can use the cordova crosswalk engine for the ionic
> > > > platform.
> > > >
> > > > I've been working with Ian and Andrew on this to gather more
> > > understanding
> > > > and to get some help along the way. I must say, excellent work,
> > everyone.
> > > >
> > > > As such, we've accumulated quite a bit of users who are actively
> using
> > > > Cordova Android 4.0. Currently, we've had over 10k test trials with
> it,
> > > and
> > > > I'm happy to say, mostly it's been smooth.
> > > >
> > > > What I've done is made a fork to adjust a few small things, but for
> the
> > > > most part, we're using 4.0.
> > > >
> > > > I'd love to provide any more feedback that you'd wish.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for the awesome work.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey
> > > > >
> > > > > So, it's finally here. I want to see us work more on Pluggable
> > > > > Webviews, and adding the API, but I think it's time that we
> released
> > > > > what we've been working on for almost a year to our users. I know
> > > > > that the API isn't exactly the most awesome we can make it, but it
> > > > > works, and I'd rather have it out at 80% than it sitting for a few
> > more
> > > > months in limbo.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are there any major blocking tasks that would prevent a vote thread
> > > > > that anyone knows about, or should we start firing up a release? I
> > > > > don't think we're going to make our January date, but the first
> week
> > > > > of February isn't that terrible.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Joe
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Clear thoughts produce clear results."
> > > > Josh Bavari
> > > > Application Developer
> > > > Phone: 405-509-9448
> > > > Cell: 405-812-0496
> > > > Email: jbav...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
