Hi, Sorry for the delay ...
I have looked at it and I am kind of impressed. This looks exactly like something which has been turning in my head for some months now, too... Good stuff and -- as Marcel said -- clearly structured. I would definitely welcome this as a contribution to Apache Felix .. and I could even imagine, that in Apache Sling we would strongly consider migrating to this, too (as you hinted in the issue ;-) ). Regards Felix Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > Now I'm back from vacation and has brushed up the code. I have submitted a > Jira task with the details (FELIX-1456). Since I really hate Jira as a patch > repository and I do not have commit rights I have uploaded the source and > binaries at a google hosted repository. It's two examples inside to show how > to use the bridged implementation. Tell me what you think :-) > > BR, > Sten Roger > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik <s...@x3m.com> wrote: > >> Great. I am on a vacation right now, but when I'm back I will make >> available the code and binaries so that others can play with it. >> >> // srs >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>wrote: >> >>> On 7/28/09 2:44 AM, Rob Walker wrote: >>> >>>> We're a big user of the current felix Jetty http. >>>> >>>> Would definitely welcome any improvement/enhancement - personally I'd >>>> like to see it as a parallel implementation initially, so we can look at >>>> both side by side. And then later, if/when everyone is happy and has moved >>>> across then we could look to deprecate the existing one. >>>> >>>> My motives are purely selfish here - we have a lot of live users on the >>>> current implementation, and have had a couple of issues in the past where >>>> changes broke these implementations. So it'd be good to be able to stage >>>> any >>>> migration. >>>> >>> Even if we replace the existing impl, the old binary and source releases >>> do not go away, so no one would be forced to upgrade before they were >>> ready...of course, if there is some irreconcilable incompatibility between >>> the two then we'd have an issue, but I doubt that would be the case since >>> they are supposed to be implementing the same spec. >>> >>> Well, it sounds like there is sufficient interest, so it would be great if >>> Sten could make it available for people to play with via JIRA. >>> >>> What do you think, Sten? >>> >>> -> richard >>> >>> >>> >>>> On the plus note - although our usage is quite basic, we do stick >>>> strictly to what OSGi exposes as the HttpService API layer and use no other >>>> features. So we make quite a good test site to ensure the fundamentals of >>>> the base API are working as per the spec. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> -- Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> >
