Will look at that and see how to include it. It's not going in right now, since my first priority is to get it up in felix svn.
BR, Sten Roger On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Clement Escoffier < clement.escoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is what we did : > http://clement.plop-plop.net/comet/ > > As you will see, it's quite simple, but has quite well worked. > > Regards, > > Clement > > > > > On 28.08.2009, at 09:26, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote: > > Looked quickly at cometd and especially cometd-java. It looks to me that >> this is trivial to include in the http service implementation. Will look >> into this. >> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sten Roger Sandvik <s...@x3m.com> wrote: >> >> The new http service is not testet alot. It's only been used in our own >>> projects for now, but I will need to create more unit tests and some >>> integration tests. As for comet support - I have tought of it, but have >>> not >>> come around to do it. I will gladly look at the "current" comet support >>> to >>> see if it's a trivial ting to include. >>> >>> Yes, it would be great to be included as a committer. I really like the >>> Felix project and are really committed to create the best http service >>> implementation out there :-) >>> >>> BR, >>> Sten Roger >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Rob Walker <r...@ascert.com> wrote: >>> >>> Good point - we also have a "home grown" cometd approach which we use >>>> for >>>> server push to our GWT application, so something built into the http >>>> server >>>> would definitely be of interest >>>> - R >>>> >>>> >>>> Clement Escoffier wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Just my 2 cents. >>>>> any plan to support Cometd ? >>>>> >>>>> We slightly change the current HTTP Service to support Cometd. I don't >>>>> see any issue to do the same on Sten's version. >>>>> (of course, I can send what we quickly did). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As a reminder, Cometd is an HTTP based MOM, allowing (after a >>>>> handshake) >>>>> a server to notify browser. In Ajax-based interaction, the client >>>>> (periodically) query the server. With Comet, the server notifies the >>>>> clients. >>>>> As you can imagine, this is definitely important for dynamic web >>>>> application. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Clement >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28.08.2009, at 08:40, Rob Walker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>>>>> >>>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and >>>>>> code >>>>>> >>>>>> From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility >>>>>>> >>>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be >>>>>> wrong >>>>>> and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks anything >>>>>> present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll either be >>>>>> fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the current >>>>>> service - >>>>>> so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be able to advise >>>>>> other >>>>>> Felix guys of anything that might differ and need application changes. >>>>>> I'm >>>>>> happy to make time to look at this next week. >>>>>> >>>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need >>>>>> to >>>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>>>>> >>>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty >>>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller >>>>>> solution >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Rob >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge >>>> r...@ascert.com >>>> +44 (0)20 7488 3470 >>>> www.ascert.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
