The new http service is not testet alot. It's only been used in our own projects for now, but I will need to create more unit tests and some integration tests. As for comet support - I have tought of it, but have not come around to do it. I will gladly look at the "current" comet support to see if it's a trivial ting to include.
Yes, it would be great to be included as a committer. I really like the Felix project and are really committed to create the best http service implementation out there :-) BR, Sten Roger On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Rob Walker <r...@ascert.com> wrote: > Good point - we also have a "home grown" cometd approach which we use for > server push to our GWT application, so something built into the http server > would definitely be of interest > - R > > > Clement Escoffier wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just my 2 cents. >> any plan to support Cometd ? >> >> We slightly change the current HTTP Service to support Cometd. I don't see >> any issue to do the same on Sten's version. >> (of course, I can send what we quickly did). >> >> >> As a reminder, Cometd is an HTTP based MOM, allowing (after a handshake) a >> server to notify browser. In Ajax-based interaction, the client >> (periodically) query the server. With Comet, the server notifies the >> clients. >> As you can imagine, this is definitely important for dynamic web >> application. >> >> Regards, >> >> Clement >> >> >> On 28.08.2009, at 08:40, Rob Walker wrote: >> >> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>> >>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>> >>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and code >>> >>> >From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility >>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be wrong >>> and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks anything >>> present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll either be >>> fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the current service - >>> so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be able to advise other >>> Felix guys of anything that might differ and need application changes. I'm >>> happy to make time to look at this next week. >>> >>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need to >>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>> >>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty >>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller solution >>> >>> -- Rob >>> >>> >>> >> > -- > > > Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge > r...@ascert.com > +44 (0)20 7488 3470 > www.ascert.com > >
