Attached the source in the jira task ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what format that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached a md5 checksum for the package.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik <s...@x3m.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>wrote: > >> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Rob Walker schrieb: >>> >>> >>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>>> >>>> >>> The next steps are IIRC the following: >>> >>> * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to >>> the issue and publishes a package checksum. >>> >>> >> >> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices from the >> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file). Package >> renaming is not necessary at this point. >> > > Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a tarball and > add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer rights so > that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a seperate vote? > > >> >> >> * We vote on accepting this submission >>> * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form, >>> sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h) >>> * Add the code into the SVN >>> >> >>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process. >>> >>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ? >>> >>> >> >> I am happy to have you do it. :-) >> >> Of course, I can help if needed. >> >> -> richard >> >> >> Regards >>> Felix >>> >>> >>> >>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>>> >>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and code >>>> >>>> > From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility >>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be >>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks >>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll >>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the >>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be >>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and need >>>> application changes. I'm happy to make time to look at this next week. >>>> >>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need to >>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>>> >>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty >>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller >>>> solution >>>> >>>> -- Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
