On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>wrote:
> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Rob Walker schrieb: >> >> >>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>> >>> >> The next steps are IIRC the following: >> >> * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to >> the issue and publishes a package checksum. >> >> > > I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices from the > files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file). Package > renaming is not necessary at this point. > Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a tarball and add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer rights so that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a seperate vote? > > > * We vote on accepting this submission >> * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form, >> sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h) >> * Add the code into the SVN >> > >> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process. >> >> Any volunteers (I could do it) ? >> >> > > I am happy to have you do it. :-) > > Of course, I can help if needed. > > -> richard > > > Regards >> Felix >> >> >> >>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>> >>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and code >>> >>> > From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility >>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be >>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks >>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll >>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the >>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be >>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and need >>> application changes. I'm happy to make time to look at this next week. >>> >>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need to >>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>> >>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty >>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller >>> solution >>> >>> -- Rob >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
