Hi, Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>wrote: > >> On 8/28/09 16:30, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> >>> Hi Sten, >>> >>> Looks bascially good (files as appropriate have the license headers, MD5 >>> checksum matches). >>> >>> Just two remarks: >>> >>> * The pom.xml should also have the license headers >>> (this can probably be fixed when we import into SVN) >>> >>> * there is a runner folder containing scripts and the >>> pax runner library. >>> This should probably not be included, right ? >>> (again, I think we can start the process and just omit >>> this directory when importing into SVN) >>> >>> As part of the IP-process we also need an ICLA of you, Sten, on file. I >>> see there is one for Sten Roger Sanvik with email s...@xbm.com. Am I >>> correct to assume, that this is your ICLA ? >>> >>> Thanks again for your submission, I will now start the process of >>> getting this into Felix SVN. >>> >>> >> Which will require Sten to fill out a Software Grant, which may need to >> come from his employer if it is actually the employer who is contributing >> the code. > > > No, it does not need to be from my employer. Been coding this in my spare > time. It has been used at Enonic (my current workplace) in form of some > binaries. So a grant from Enonic is not neccessary. But will be happy to > provide one if you really need it.
A Corporate CLA is only required if your employer pays your for working on Apache projects. But what we would probably need to be good for IP clearance is a software grant [1]. You may fax it to the same number as the ICLA. Thanks. Regards Felix [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt > > >> >> -> richard >> >> >> Regards >>> Felix >>> >>> >>> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: >>> >>> >>>> Attached the source in the jira task ( >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what >>>> format >>>> that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached a md5 >>>> checksum for the package. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<s...@x3m.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rob Walker schrieb: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The next steps are IIRC the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to >>>>>>> the issue and publishes a package checksum. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices from >>>>>> the >>>>>> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file). >>>>>> Package >>>>>> renaming is not necessary at this point. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a tarball >>>>> and >>>>> add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer rights >>>>> so >>>>> that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a seperate >>>>> vote? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * We vote on accepting this submission >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form, >>>>>>> sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h) >>>>>>> * Add the code into the SVN >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I am happy to have you do it. :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course, I can help if needed. >>>>>> >>>>>> -> richard >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and >>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be >>>>>>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks >>>>>>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll >>>>>>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the >>>>>>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be >>>>>>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and >>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>> application changes. I'm happy to make time to look at this next >>>>>>>> week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty >>>>>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller >>>>>>>> solution >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Rob >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >
