On 8/28/09 16:43, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 8/28/09 16:30, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Sten,
Looks bascially good (files as appropriate have the license headers, MD5
checksum matches).
Just two remarks:
* The pom.xml should also have the license headers
(this can probably be fixed when we import into SVN)
* there is a runner folder containing scripts and the
pax runner library.
This should probably not be included, right ?
(again, I think we can start the process and just omit
this directory when importing into SVN)
As part of the IP-process we also need an ICLA of you, Sten, on file. I
see there is one for Sten Roger Sanvik with email s...@xbm.com. Am I
correct to assume, that this is your ICLA ?
Thanks again for your submission, I will now start the process of
getting this into Felix SVN.
Which will require Sten to fill out a Software Grant, which may need
to come from his employer if it is actually the employer who is
contributing the code.
And of course, we still have to vote and accept it before any of this is
truly necessary...
-> richard
-> richard
Regards
Felix
Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb:
Attached the source in the jira task (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what
format
that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached
a md5
checksum for the package.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<s...@x3m.com>
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S.
Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>wrote:
On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Rob Walker schrieb:
What do we need to do make this happen guys?
The next steps are IIRC the following:
* Sten packages the source and attaches the package to
the issue and publishes a package checksum.
I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices
from the
files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java
file). Package
renaming is not necessary at this point.
Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a
tarball and
add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer
rights so
that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a
seperate vote?
* We vote on accepting this submission
* We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form,
sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h)
* Add the code into the SVN
I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process.
Any volunteers (I could do it) ?
I am happy to have you do it. :-)
Of course, I can help if needed.
-> richard
Regards
Felix
Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos.
Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach
and code
From our side, we can certainly run some "real world"
compatibility
tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be
wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks
anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure
it'll
either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the
current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though
to be
able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ
and need
application changes. I'm happy to make time to look at this
next week.
After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also
need to
propose you as a committter for maintenance?
Great progress though - the current Http service has served us
pretty
well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller
solution
-- Rob
