Let me summarise my thoughts

Perceived value of merit can be different for every individual's , it's
like defining who is best and honestly this is going to full of bias
(Hoping apache is not using any kind of AI behind :)) Studies have shown
that organizational cultures that value meritocracy often result in greater
inequality

It's time that we break this practice , since merit is something that
cannot be quantified and it can be pursued on equal terms and rather accept
that the community is unequal . Acceptance may provide some form of wisdom.

Times are not equal these days!





On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:21 PM Saransh Sharma <sara...@muellners.org>
wrote:

>
> Thanks KAG for clarifying but in my opinion the term self is not the
> focus,let me state the context for you here, that this is regarding the
> decision making or rather consensus from the community.  But the term is
> misleading and needs to be modified .
>
> What if the community or the volunteers want to select  PMC ?As I have
> read its a closed system to select a PMC,
>
> Is there any provision for that ? Then we have an open system. Current
> system and selection of those who get to decide most of the stuff happens
> behind the scenes like selection of PMC could we do it openly?
>
> Right now the participation of the project happens via the PMC and
> committers and developers are left behind since they don't hold any right
> over the project direction. This plagues the direction of the project since
> only handful are there to select or vote out.  We need to empower all the
> participants through some common exchange of value system. Like users ,
> developers who could vote for PMC selection.
> Let me know your thoughts
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:56 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 21, 2021, at 8:03 AM, Saransh Sharma <sara...@muellners.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Awasum for your reference
>>
>> Apache Projects are overseen by a self-selected team
>>
>>
>> Saransh for your reference.
>>
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Saransh Sharma
> Research Partner
>
> This mail is governed by Muellners®  IT policy.
> The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
> may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
> attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
> of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
> monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
> compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
> are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
> intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
> to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
>


-- 
Thanks and regards,

Saransh Sharma
Research Partner

This mail is governed by Muellners®  IT policy.
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.

Reply via email to