Thanks KAG for clarifying but in my opinion the term self is not the focus,let me state the context for you here, that this is regarding the decision making or rather consensus from the community. But the term is misleading and needs to be modified .
What if the community or the volunteers want to select PMC ?As I have read its a closed system to select a PMC, Is there any provision for that ? Then we have an open system. Current system and selection of those who get to decide most of the stuff happens behind the scenes like selection of PMC could we do it openly? Right now the participation of the project happens via the PMC and committers and developers are left behind since they don't hold any right over the project direction. This plagues the direction of the project since only handful are there to select or vote out. We need to empower all the participants through some common exchange of value system. Like users , developers who could vote for PMC selection. Let me know your thoughts On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:56 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 21, 2021, at 8:03 AM, Saransh Sharma <sara...@muellners.org> wrote: > > Awasum for your reference > > Apache Projects are overseen by a self-selected team > > > Saransh for your reference. > > > Wrong. > -- Thanks and regards, Saransh Sharma Research Partner This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy. The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
