> code and vice versa. I still think that RequireJS is the better choice, as > Closure implements *synchronous* require() which does not work dynamically > in the browser, and the Closure Library comes with many many more features,
I really wish you would stop saying this. It is simply not true. Please look at the 'js-intermediate' output to see how 'base.js' dynamically loads only those files from the 'goog' library it actually uses, in the order needed to allow proper instantiation. How is that different from RequireJS? Also, how is 'many, many more features' a bad thing? Please take a look at the proof of concept (both the intermediate and release code) before making these kinds of statements. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
