I am sorry, but I voted a -1 binding as well and my concerns have not been addressed.
If we are going to go ahead, can we at least bring it into a contrib folder and make at least one release out of it before promoting it to a main repo? Thanks, Om On Jun 1, 2013 10:07 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > Ok Erik, > > I see it ok as well. As you said there's only one -1 binding vote (Igor > Costa) and one -1 non binding vote (Carlos Velasco), and it was already > explained the motivations behind the donation and the intention to maintain > swiz out of main flex-sdk cycle and not promote it as the preferred mvc-ioc > microarquitecture. > > So for me it's ok, if it's ok for the rest of people here. > > Hope Chris could send us that email soon regarding it's intention of donate > the source code and wiki > > Thanks to you Erik as well for clearing things here. > > > Carlos > > > > 2013/6/1 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > > > I think this is a valid vote and there is no need to declare it > > invalid. There is only one definite, binding -1 (Igor) and he declined > > to explain his motivation, something that is customary when casting a > > negative vote. > > > > Once Chris Scott 'officially' donates Swiz - there are some hoops he > > has to jump through, but we'll get to those when he contacts us- we > > can create a new repo for it: either a general 'flex-contrib/swiz' or > > a specific one, like 'flex-swiz', we need to discuss that a bit more, > > I think. > > > > Thank you Carlos for managing the vote and keeping track of this > donation. > > > > EdB > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 94 80 80 > http://www.codeoscopic.com > http://www.directwriter.es > http://www.avant2.es >
