What steps are required from the author to make the donation? Since he has moved on to other things, I'd like to bother him as less as possible.
Parsley3/Spicelib3 are release under Apache License 2.0. The framework consists of several libraries which can be found here https://github.com/spicefactory . And there is a JIRA: http://opensource.powerflasher.com/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa Am 01.06.2013 22:14, schrieb Carlos Rovira: > Right! why not? :) > > I don't know too much about parsely but seems it's in the same state that > Swiz. If AOP efforts progress all frameworks like swiz and parsley could > benefit from the hooks in the compiler to implement it and will need people > behind it to make this evolution. > > I think the only requeriment here is to have people interested in donate > time and effort in the donation and subsequent maintenance of the source > code... > > > 2013/6/1 dude <d...@atheist.com> > >> So Parsley could find a new home here as well? >> >> Am 01.06.2013 18:54, schrieb Erik de Bruin: >>> The way we voted to include Swiz will be applied to any other >>> framework if/when those are donated as well. >>> >>> The fact that Swiz gets a home at Apache Flex doesn't mean it will be >>> endorsed as the one and only option. People get to chose what they >>> want to use - the SDK isn't and won't be tied to any framework - and >>> if they chose to use Swiz, they can find it at Apache Flex. That's it. >>> >>> EdB >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Igor Costa <igorco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> A year back, someone at Flex Brazil group asked me why we couldn't >> simple >>>> have a MVC approach into the SDK. >>>> >>>> My short answer was We prefer you decide which way you want to code, >> rather >>>> than force you on our perspective way. >>>> >>>> For mature and freedom of choice we should not have such only a way of >>>> coding, like explicit someone to code on that specific way. >>>> >>>> We have a plethora of Flex frameworks out there, if we include one, we >>>> should include all of it. >>>> >>>> For the freedom of choice that's why I voted -1. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------- >>>> Igor Costa >>>> www.igorcosta.com >>>> www.igorcosta.org >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think this is a valid vote and there is no need to declare it >>>>> invalid. There is only one definite, binding -1 (Igor) and he declined >>>>> to explain his motivation, something that is customary when casting a >>>>> negative vote. >>>>> >>>>> Once Chris Scott 'officially' donates Swiz - there are some hoops he >>>>> has to jump through, but we'll get to those when he contacts us- we >>>>> can create a new repo for it: either a general 'flex-contrib/swiz' or >>>>> a specific one, like 'flex-swiz', we need to discuss that a bit more, >>>>> I think. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you Carlos for managing the vote and keeping track of this >> donation. >>>>> >>>>> EdB >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
