Ok Erik, I see it ok as well. As you said there's only one -1 binding vote (Igor Costa) and one -1 non binding vote (Carlos Velasco), and it was already explained the motivations behind the donation and the intention to maintain swiz out of main flex-sdk cycle and not promote it as the preferred mvc-ioc microarquitecture.
So for me it's ok, if it's ok for the rest of people here. Hope Chris could send us that email soon regarding it's intention of donate the source code and wiki Thanks to you Erik as well for clearing things here. Carlos 2013/6/1 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > I think this is a valid vote and there is no need to declare it > invalid. There is only one definite, binding -1 (Igor) and he declined > to explain his motivation, something that is customary when casting a > negative vote. > > Once Chris Scott 'officially' donates Swiz - there are some hoops he > has to jump through, but we'll get to those when he contacts us- we > can create a new repo for it: either a general 'flex-contrib/swiz' or > a specific one, like 'flex-swiz', we need to discuss that a bit more, > I think. > > Thank you Carlos for managing the vote and keeping track of this donation. > > EdB > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es
