Right! why not? :) I don't know too much about parsely but seems it's in the same state that Swiz. If AOP efforts progress all frameworks like swiz and parsley could benefit from the hooks in the compiler to implement it and will need people behind it to make this evolution.
I think the only requeriment here is to have people interested in donate time and effort in the donation and subsequent maintenance of the source code... 2013/6/1 dude <d...@atheist.com> > So Parsley could find a new home here as well? > > Am 01.06.2013 18:54, schrieb Erik de Bruin: > > The way we voted to include Swiz will be applied to any other > > framework if/when those are donated as well. > > > > The fact that Swiz gets a home at Apache Flex doesn't mean it will be > > endorsed as the one and only option. People get to chose what they > > want to use - the SDK isn't and won't be tied to any framework - and > > if they chose to use Swiz, they can find it at Apache Flex. That's it. > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Igor Costa <igorco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A year back, someone at Flex Brazil group asked me why we couldn't > simple > >> have a MVC approach into the SDK. > >> > >> My short answer was We prefer you decide which way you want to code, > rather > >> than force you on our perspective way. > >> > >> For mature and freedom of choice we should not have such only a way of > >> coding, like explicit someone to code on that specific way. > >> > >> We have a plethora of Flex frameworks out there, if we include one, we > >> should include all of it. > >> > >> For the freedom of choice that's why I voted -1. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------- > >> Igor Costa > >> www.igorcosta.com > >> www.igorcosta.org > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > wrote: > >> > >>> I think this is a valid vote and there is no need to declare it > >>> invalid. There is only one definite, binding -1 (Igor) and he declined > >>> to explain his motivation, something that is customary when casting a > >>> negative vote. > >>> > >>> Once Chris Scott 'officially' donates Swiz - there are some hoops he > >>> has to jump through, but we'll get to those when he contacts us- we > >>> can create a new repo for it: either a general 'flex-contrib/swiz' or > >>> a specific one, like 'flex-swiz', we need to discuss that a bit more, > >>> I think. > >>> > >>> Thank you Carlos for managing the vote and keeping track of this > donation. > >>> > >>> EdB > >>> > > > > > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es
