On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Stephane Beladaci (Flexengineer) < adobeflexengin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Erik, > > What is your problem exactly? You are the only one complaining, the > discussion is actually picking up, several participants reminded you that > this discussion has its place here. So what it is, am I an obstacle to the > Apache Foundation grand plan to hijack Flex to JS? Or is it just that you > do not like what I say? Because it is very relevant to the future of every > Flex developer, with their career on the line. > > So you know what, if you have a problem with this thread just ban me. I > have been having increasing concerns about whether or not Apache is a good > home for Flex. So make my point. The last one who tried was Apple on their > forums and it was retweeted around the globe nonstop every minute for 24 > hours. > > -Stephane > > Stephane, I am with Erik (and I guess most of the Apache Flex PMC is too) I think the discussion has strayed away from the original intention. I suggest that the next steps would be create a github project, start coding the new player and share it with the mailing list. If people like what they see, they will start contributing. Thanks, Om > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > Stephane, > > > > Between Ray Kurzweil and Larry Flint you've gone off topic far and long > > enough. I don't see how reiterating the same 'industry observations' over > > and over will bring your suggested "The Player" product any closer. > > > > This forum is dedicated to discussions about issues related to the > > development of Flex SDK related software in the context of the Apache > > organization. If you plan to start the development of the "The Player" > > product under the Apache Flex project, I'm sure the PMC is open to > > considering an in depth and coherent proposal. If you plan to develop > this > > software under a different umbrella, please point any interested devs > there > > and continue this 'discussion' over on that forum. > > > > Thanks, > > > > EdB > > >
