Hi Erik, you're referring to this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pkq_eBHXJ4 (minute 1'15'') hehe ;) 2017-09-14 9:29 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>: > Royale > > makes me think of French hamburgers :-) > > I do like > > Bend > > To keep things simple, my prime candidate is still simply > > FlexJS > > EdB > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex > > found? > > > > We are writing in AS - what about emphasis this to RoyaleAS? > > > > I'm still not sure yet whether name change convince me.. > > > > Piotr > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, 03:35 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > > > > > Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex? [Flex 2? or was > > > it Flex 1?] > > > > > > > > > On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Hi - > > > > > > > > I did a quick suitable name search. > > > > > > > > Royale might be taken by this individual’s project > > > > https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale > > > > > > > > Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products > mostly. > > > > There is a lot of “Clash Royale" > > > > > > > > And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction > > > > to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Dave > > > > > > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > > >> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi - > > > >> > > > >> We have one alternative name - Royale > > > >> > > > >> Are there others that people would like to propose? > > > >> > > > >> If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Dave > > > >> > > > >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > > >>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi Om, > > > >>> > > > >>> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards > FlexJS. > > > >>> If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and > more > > > >>> complicated VOTE counting. > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Dave > > > >>> > > > >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > > >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> We could always structure the VOTE like this: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 1. Royale > > > >>>> 2. XXX > > > >>>> 3. YYY > > > >>>> 4. FlexJS > > > >>>> > > > >>>> One vote should answer both questions. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Om > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > > > >>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not > > > >>>>> change the > > > >>>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help > > with > > > >>>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed > > > >>>>> name... > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name > still > > > >>>>> with > > > >>>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at > > > >>>>> least one > > > >>>>> day more before VOTE. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Piotr > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki > > > >>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to > > > >>>>>> build new > > > >>>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can > > > always > > > >>>>> state > > > >>>>>> from where we have come and what was our story. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" > > > >>>>>> as the > > > >>>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use > > > >>>>>> it since > > > >>>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>> Piotr > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > > >>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi - > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, > > > >>>>>>>> that’s > > > >>>>>>> value I can recognize. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be > > > >>>>>>>> involved > > > >>>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around > > > >>>>>>> the name. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I > > do > > > >>>>> about > > > >>>>>>> mine. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t > > > >>>>>>>> want to > > > >>>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new > > > >>>>>>> name can > > > >>>>> we > > > >>>>>>> try and pick one quickly? > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow > > morning. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the > > > >>>>>>> result then > > > >>>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough > time. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>>> Dave > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Harbs > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > > >>>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com > > > >>>>>>> <mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really > > > >>>>>>>>> important > > > >>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is > > > >>>>>>> important in > > > >>>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we > > > >>>>>>>>> don't > > > >>>>>>> get a > > > >>>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site > where > > we > > > >>>>>>> explain > > > >>>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our > > > >>>>>>>>> time, > > > >>>>>>> since > > > >>>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS > > > >>>>>>>>> projects, and > > > >>>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things > > other > > > >>>>> than > > > >>>>>>> JS!! > > > >>>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT > name > > > for > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > > > >>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > > >>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 > > > >>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > > >>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > >>>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jeffry Houser > > > Technical Entrepreneur > > > http://www.dot-com-it.com > > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > > 203-379-0773 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
