Here’s a list of other options which came up off-list: > Limber (or maybe Limbre/Limbur for a unique name) > LimberApp > Boinga (unique name which retains the message) > > Actually, Bead or alternately Beed might be usable > Strands can probably also work.
> Beads > > and second > > Strands > Action > KickAS > > Another idea: NewAction > > What about FractionScript? > > NewScript? > Warp > > We can also go for a translation of Flex. > > Biegen anyone? ;-) > > The Swedish translation looks cool: Böja > Maybe something to do with connections or lineage... Heritage / Ancestry / > Derivation ? > > Or more towards the future / destination.... arrive / attain / reach / emerge > / dawn / arise > > > "AS Dawn" sounds like a new beginning. > On Sep 14, 2017, at 8:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex found? > > We are writing in AS - what about emphasis this to RoyaleAS? > > I'm still not sure yet whether name change convince me.. > > Piotr > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, 03:35 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > >> Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex? [Flex 2? or was >> it Flex 1?] >> >> >> On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> Hi - >>> >>> I did a quick suitable name search. >>> >>> Royale might be taken by this individual’s project >>> https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale >>> >>> Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly. >>> There is a lot of “Clash Royale" >>> >>> And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction >>> to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net >>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi - >>>> >>>> We have one alternative name - Royale >>>> >>>> Are there others that people would like to propose? >>>> >>>> If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net >>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Om, >>>>> >>>>> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. >>>>> If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more >>>>> complicated VOTE counting. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We could always structure the VOTE like this: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Royale >>>>>> 2. XXX >>>>>> 3. YYY >>>>>> 4. FlexJS >>>>>> >>>>>> One vote should answer both questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Om >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki >>>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not >>>>>>> change the >>>>>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with >>>>>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed >>>>>>> name... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at >>>>>>> least one >>>>>>> day more before VOTE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki >>>>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to >>>>>>>> build new >>>>>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can >> always >>>>>>> state >>>>>>>> from where we have come and what was our story. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" >>>>>>>> as the >>>>>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use >>>>>>>> it since >>>>>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net >>>>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, >>>>>>>>>> that’s >>>>>>>>> value I can recognize. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be >>>>>>>>>> involved >>>>>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around >>>>>>>>> the name. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do >>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> mine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t >>>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new >>>>>>>>> name can >>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>> try and pick one quickly? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the >>>>>>>>> result then >>>>>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really >>>>>>>>>>> important >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is >>>>>>>>> important in >>>>>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we >>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>> get a >>>>>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we >>>>>>>>> explain >>>>>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our >>>>>>>>>>> time, >>>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS >>>>>>>>>>> projects, and >>>>>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other >>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>> JS!! >>>>>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name >> for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> >>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >>>>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 >>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >>>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jeffry Houser >> Technical Entrepreneur >> http://www.dot-com-it.com >> http://www.jeffryhouser.com >> 203-379-0773 >> >>
