You caught me. Royale may be a killer name (yeah, a pun, again ;-)) but I'm not convinced. Coming from a kingdom with a less than inspiring king, the name is not giving me a warm and fuzzy feeling. And, to me, it is also not a really a 'catchy' name, so my preference stays with Blend. Or FlexJS, if we end up staying with Apache after all.
EdB On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Carlos Rovira < carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > Hi Erik, > > you're referring to this? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pkq_eBHXJ4 > > (minute 1'15'') > > hehe > > ;) > > > > 2017-09-14 9:29 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>: > > > Royale > > > > makes me think of French hamburgers :-) > > > > I do like > > > > Bend > > > > To keep things simple, my prime candidate is still simply > > > > FlexJS > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex > > > found? > > > > > > We are writing in AS - what about emphasis this to RoyaleAS? > > > > > > I'm still not sure yet whether name change convince me.. > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, 03:35 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex? [Flex 2? or > was > > > > it Flex 1?] > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > Hi - > > > > > > > > > > I did a quick suitable name search. > > > > > > > > > > Royale might be taken by this individual’s project > > > > > https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products > > mostly. > > > > > There is a lot of “Clash Royale" > > > > > > > > > > And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp > Fiction > > > > > to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > > > >> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi - > > > > >> > > > > >> We have one alternative name - Royale > > > > >> > > > > >> Are there others that people would like to propose? > > > > >> > > > > >> If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Dave > > > > >> > > > > >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > > > >>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Hi Om, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards > > FlexJS. > > > > >>> If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and > > more > > > > >>> complicated VOTE counting. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Regards, > > > > >>> Dave > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > > > >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> We could always structure the VOTE like this: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> 1. Royale > > > > >>>> 2. XXX > > > > >>>> 3. YYY > > > > >>>> 4. FlexJS > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> One vote should answer both questions. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>> Om > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > > > > >>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not > > > > >>>>> change the > > > > >>>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for > help > > > with > > > > >>>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with > changed > > > > >>>>> name... > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name > > still > > > > >>>>> with > > > > >>>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at > > > > >>>>> least one > > > > >>>>> day more before VOTE. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Piotr > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki > > > > >>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name > change. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to > > > > >>>>>> build new > > > > >>>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can > > > > always > > > > >>>>> state > > > > >>>>>> from where we have come and what was our story. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup > "Royale" > > > > >>>>>> as the > > > > >>>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we > use > > > > >>>>>> it since > > > > >>>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>> Piotr > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > > > >>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Hi - > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing > it, > > > > >>>>>>>> that’s > > > > >>>>>>> value I can recognize. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to > be > > > > >>>>>>>> involved > > > > >>>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around > > > > >>>>>>> the name. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position > than I > > > do > > > > >>>>> about > > > > >>>>>>> mine. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t > > > > >>>>>>>> want to > > > > >>>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new > > > > >>>>>>> name can > > > > >>>>> we > > > > >>>>>>> try and pick one quickly? > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow > > > morning. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the > > > > >>>>>>> result then > > > > >>>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough > > time. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Regards, > > > > >>>>>>> Dave > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Harbs > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > > > >>>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com > > > > >>>>>>> <mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really > > > > >>>>>>>>> important > > > > >>>>>>> for > > > > >>>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and > is > > > > >>>>>>> important in > > > > >>>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If > we > > > > >>>>>>>>> don't > > > > >>>>>>> get a > > > > >>>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site > > where > > > we > > > > >>>>>>> explain > > > > >>>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing > our > > > > >>>>>>>>> time, > > > > >>>>>>> since > > > > >>>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS > > > > >>>>>>>>> projects, and > > > > >>>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things > > > other > > > > >>>>> than > > > > >>>>>>> JS!! > > > > >>>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT > > name > > > > for > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > > > > >>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > > > >>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 > > > > >>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > > > >>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jeffry Houser > > > > Technical Entrepreneur > > > > http://www.dot-com-it.com > > > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > > > 203-379-0773 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > http://www.avant2.es > > > Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria. > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
