How about FlexForward? Maybe better for the project name. On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:48 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here’s a list of other options which came up off-list: > > > Limber (or maybe Limbre/Limbur for a unique name) > > LimberApp > > Boinga (unique name which retains the message) > > > > Actually, Bead or alternately Beed might be usable > > Strands can probably also work. > > > Beads > > > > and second > > > > Strands > > > Action > > > > KickAS > > > > Another idea: NewAction > > > > What about FractionScript? > > > > NewScript? > > Warp > > > > We can also go for a translation of Flex. > > > > Biegen anyone? ;-) > > > > The Swedish translation looks cool: Böja > > > Maybe something to do with connections or lineage... Heritage / > Ancestry / Derivation ? > > > > Or more towards the future / destination.... arrive / attain / reach / > emerge / dawn / arise > > > > > > "AS Dawn" sounds like a new beginning. > > > > On Sep 14, 2017, at 8:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex > found? > > > > We are writing in AS - what about emphasis this to RoyaleAS? > > > > I'm still not sure yet whether name change convince me.. > > > > Piotr > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, 03:35 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > > > >> Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex? [Flex 2? or was > >> it Flex 1?] > >> > >> > >> On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >>> Hi - > >>> > >>> I did a quick suitable name search. > >>> > >>> Royale might be taken by this individual’s project > >>> https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale > >>> > >>> Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly. > >>> There is a lot of “Clash Royale" > >>> > >>> And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction > >>> to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Dave > >>> > >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > >>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi - > >>>> > >>>> We have one alternative name - Royale > >>>> > >>>> Are there others that people would like to propose? > >>>> > >>>> If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Dave > >>>> > >>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > >>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Om, > >>>>> > >>>>> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. > >>>>> If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more > >>>>> complicated VOTE counting. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Dave > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > >>>>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We could always structure the VOTE like this: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. Royale > >>>>>> 2. XXX > >>>>>> 3. YYY > >>>>>> 4. FlexJS > >>>>>> > >>>>>> One vote should answer both questions. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Om > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not > >>>>>>> change the > >>>>>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help > with > >>>>>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed > >>>>>>> name... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still > >>>>>>> with > >>>>>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at > >>>>>>> least one > >>>>>>> day more before VOTE. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to > >>>>>>>> build new > >>>>>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can > >> always > >>>>>>> state > >>>>>>>> from where we have come and what was our story. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" > >>>>>>>> as the > >>>>>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use > >>>>>>>> it since > >>>>>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > >>>>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi - > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, > >>>>>>>>>> that’s > >>>>>>>>> value I can recognize. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be > >>>>>>>>>> involved > >>>>>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around > >>>>>>>>> the name. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I > do > >>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>> mine. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t > >>>>>>>>>> want to > >>>>>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new > >>>>>>>>> name can > >>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>> try and pick one quickly? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow > morning. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the > >>>>>>>>> result then > >>>>>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> Dave > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Harbs > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > >>>>>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really > >>>>>>>>>>> important > >>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is > >>>>>>>>> important in > >>>>>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we > >>>>>>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>>>> get a > >>>>>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where > we > >>>>>>>>> explain > >>>>>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our > >>>>>>>>>>> time, > >>>>>>>>> since > >>>>>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS > >>>>>>>>>>> projects, and > >>>>>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things > other > >>>>>>> than > >>>>>>>>> JS!! > >>>>>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name > >> for > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > >>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > >>>>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 > >>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > >>>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Jeffry Houser > >> Technical Entrepreneur > >> http://www.dot-com-it.com > >> http://www.jeffryhouser.com > >> 203-379-0773 > >> > >> > >
