Thanks for driving this Deepthi. Looks great to me; a huge improvement over the current website. We had agreed in the previous discussion [1] to keep the main website separate from the docs since the target audience is different. I am inclined to decouple the two and re-evaluate updating the docs in a separate FLIP later.
Thanks, Danny [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/c3pt00cf77lrtgt242p26lgp9l2z5yc8 On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 2:38 PM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's exciting to finally have someone to refactor the Flink website. > > Thanks Deepthi. > > To Xintong, > > > maintain two sets of website designs at the same time > > If our website is not so complex, and new webui can be full feature > coverage, there would be no need to maintain two sets of web. > > To Jing > > +1 to consider Flink doc too. > > Best, > Jingsong > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 8:16 PM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > +1, the UI design looks good! > > > > Commonly speaking, there are two parts of the whole website: Flink Web > and > > Flink doc. Will the dart mode also cover Flink doc? > > > > Best regards, > > Jing > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 12:40 PM Matthias Pohl > > <matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > I also like the proposed designs. Considering that you want to touch > > > individual subpages, there are also some subpages of Flink's website > not > > > being mentioned in the FLIP (e.g. roadmap [1]). What is the plan with > > > those? Are they covered by the "We recommend modifications only to the > > > design of the following pages" part but are not listed there? > > > > > > Additionally, it would be nice to get a bit more insight into the > feedback > > > from users as Xintong pointed out. It would be interesting to > understand > > > how the new design helps solving certain problems (besides having the > > > motivation to modernize the look and feel). > > > > > > I'm also wondering whether it's doable to do a discussion (FLIP?) per > > > subpage on the design (as proposed by Chesnay in the first discussion > on > > > this topic [2] to have smaller changes rather than a single big one). > But I > > > could imagine this being quite tedious because different people might > > > have different opinions on how something should be done. > > > > > > I don't have any experience with frontend design. I'm wondering how > much > > > time such a redesign takes. Could it be linked to the 2.0 release? > > > > > > Thanks for the FLIP (you might want to add [2] to the FLIP's header > for the > > > sake of transparency). > > > Matthias > > > > > > [1] https://flink.apache.org/roadmap/ > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/c3pt00cf77lrtgt242p26lgp9l2z5yc8 > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:39 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 in general. > > > > > > > > Thanks for proposing this contribution, Deepthi. The new design looks > > > very > > > > cool. > > > > > > > > I have a few questions, which might be entry-level given that I > barely > > > know > > > > anything about the website design. > > > > - Do you think it's feasible to maintain two sets of website designs > at > > > the > > > > same time? E.g., adding a button "back to previous version". I'm > asking > > > > because, while the new UI might be more friendly to newcomers, the > > > original > > > > website might be more convenient for people who are already familiar > with > > > > it to find things. It would be nice if we can offer both options to > > > users. > > > > - For the documentation, I wonder if it makes sense to offer the same > > > color > > > > theme as the website, to keep the experience consistent. How much > effort > > > > does it require? > > > > - In the FLIP, you mentioned things like "there's a general > consensus" > > > and > > > > "feedback from customers". I'm curious where these come from. Have > you > > > > conducted some sort of survey? Would you mind sharing a bit more > about > > > > that? > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Xintong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 4:57 PM Feifan Wang <zoltar9...@163.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 , the new design looks more attractive and is well organized > > > > > > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > Feifan Wang > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > zoltar9...@163.com > > > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- Replied Message ---- > > > > > | From | Leonard Xu<xbjt...@gmail.com> | > > > > > | Date | 07/11/2023 16:34 | > > > > > | To | dev<dev@flink.apache.org> | > > > > > | Subject | Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP 333 - Redesign Apache Flink website > | > > > > > +1 for the redesigning, the new website looks cool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Leonard > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 2023, at 7:55 AM, Mohan, Deepthi > <mdee...@amazon.com.INVALID > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I’m opening this thread to discuss a proposal to redesign the > Apache > > > > Flink > > > > > website: https://flink.apache.org. The approach and a few initial > > > > mockups > > > > > are included in FLIP 333 - Redesign Apache Flink website.< > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-333%3A+Redesign+Apache+Flink+website > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The goal is to modernize the website design to help existing and > new > > > > users > > > > > easily understand Flink’s value proposition and make Flink > attractive > > > to > > > > > new users. As suggested in a previous thread, there are no proposed > > > > changes > > > > > to Flink documentation. > > > > > > > > > > I look forward to your feedback and the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Deepthi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
