On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:38:45PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > > > >Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM: > > > >>David Blevins wrote: > >> > >>This one > >> > >>> > >>> ../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction > >>> ../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction > >>> > >Why would we have two versions of transaction? > > > > I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was keeping > it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than "transaction". > Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically) > > .../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction > .../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction > .../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction > .../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction > .../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction >
Oh, I get it. You're just proposing to add the linux kernel odd/even spin on what we have now and dump trunk. -David
