I also am in agreement with David on this,
I think it would be a far better approach to not include them within trunk. While it may be a bit more work to release them separately from the actual server release, it would seem to be a big step backwards with what we have been working on. Perhaps we need a more thorough / checklist style release process to ensure certain requisites are always met (I.E. samples are ready as well)

Thanks,
Erik B. Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



David Jencks wrote:

On Mar 12, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:

Donald Woods wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:

2) When to release the samples? I think we should make an effort to release the samples concurrent with each Geronimo release. This is important because the jsp & servlet examples are referenced from within the welcome page on Geronimo. I suppose we could remove that reference and eliminate the need to release concurrently.
why not move the samples back under geronimo/server, so they are maintained and versioned with each release and can then be used as additional testsuite tests? If not, releasing right after a server release is fine.

I was thinking about doing this. It seems everybody thinks we should release them together anyway so what is the real value with them being split out? Does anybody object to moving them back with the server?

well, since I thought our next goal with the server build was to separate it into independently released plugins, I think putting the samples in with the main server build would be a big step backwards.

thanks
david jencks


Joe



Reply via email to