I also am in agreement with David on this,
I think it would be a far better approach to not include them within
trunk. While it may be a bit more work to release them separately from
the actual server release, it would seem to be a big step backwards with
what we have been working on.
Perhaps we need a more thorough / checklist style release process to
ensure certain requisites are always met (I.E. samples are ready as well)
Thanks,
Erik B. Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
2) When to release the samples? I think we should make an effort
to release the samples concurrent with each Geronimo release. This
is important because the jsp & servlet examples are referenced from
within the welcome page on Geronimo. I suppose we could remove
that reference and eliminate the need to release concurrently.
why not move the samples back under geronimo/server, so they are
maintained and versioned with each release and can then be used as
additional testsuite tests? If not, releasing right after a server
release is fine.
I was thinking about doing this. It seems everybody thinks we should
release them together anyway so what is the real value with them
being split out? Does anybody object to moving them back with the
server?
well, since I thought our next goal with the server build was to
separate it into independently released plugins, I think putting the
samples in with the main server build would be a big step backwards.
thanks
david jencks
Joe